Laina

I'm not too particularly worried about the tone of it. Lighting has an odd effect on it anyway, and it's a little awkward to match it to a more pinkish tone that persists in different lighting. The comment was more geared toward there not being a material for clothing that actually imposes an alpha channel to show what's beneath - and in many cases there'd be nothing to 'show' anyway, because there's no actual body mesh beneath the clothing, as it stands. I do appreciate the effort, of course!

Very solid - but I'm not sure the way the meshes correlate in current programming would suffice well for it. We have pseudo-lace in the materials where you can get some modicum of lace-like appearance, but as anyone whom has used that material well knows, it's not actually transparent, like so: Note that the "lace" does not display the tattoo, or really even the flesh beneath. I'd imagine this is due to the game's mesh not actually rendering the model beneath the clothing in order to minimize clipping issues. Those clipping issues are quite prevalent in models that have a little, shall we call it "thiccness" to them...; ...and I am very much down with the thiccness. I would, of course, absolutely love for lace materials to become a thing, and as always more unique capacity for customization is a plus. Thanks for the input! Ciao, -L

So... I realize that women have tons of clothing options - however a particular item is missing from the tops that I feel could give a little more personality to that professional or business casual look that some women love, which could add depth and layer to whatever particular look someone's going for. I am, of course, talking about this particular article of clothing, sans the blazer: I think this is something of a travesty, really - because if you consider the range of fashion that a button-up blouse is applicable to... it's obnoxiously universal. As I mentioned, it can really tie a formal or business casual outfit together. It's a rather ordinary piece of everyday fashion that also goes well with pleated plaid skirts and thigh high socks. Or jeans. Or leather leggings. The possibilities are endless. Obviously, with the material layering, this breathes new, refreshing life into customization and individuality by offering a nigh limitless number of possibilities that could complete the look of our new favorite outfits. Of course, the game already has something of the like for male characters, which brings me to my next point: They also have the option to use the Hider function to have either the sleeves long, pulled up, or rolled and fastened like so. Theirs also incorporates a tie. It could be that a female version instead has the option of having one or two... or three buttons undone. Could also be an option for the shirt tail to be tucked or remain untucked. Examples of the range of the simple button up blouse: Anywho, thanks for coming to my TED Talk.

Aaaand whether it is used with or without knowledge of it's meaning... do you believe this would stop people from showing religion or politics in their building or demeanor? I mean, certainly I don't bitch and moan about the rampant crave over things that other people similar to me would find offensive.... It's just ridiculous to assume that every existence of something that may offend someone should be excluded. Like, if I said I was offended by the term that underwear could say "It's a Trap!" (and for reference I'm not but it is a topic that has been expressed before) and asked them to remove it... I mean... maybe that's someone's fetish? Maybe it's pushing an envelope that some prefer to press. What's your end goal here?

I'm still here too. Been here since like... September or October of 2013 if memory serves. Joined the game back in September - and when the forum launched I signed up on it, as well. After all, there's a reason I still have "I'm also a dinosaur" in my profile. My join date goes back farther than my hairline. -shrugs-

I've spent nothing on Kira's profile. Or anyone's really. Any xGold I've spent I've obtained simply by logging in as little as I do. Also don't really even know Lux.... And I don't sleep with anyone as a male AV cuz I'm pretty straightforward about what I am. I don't see your beef with me.

I dunno, Dave. You wanna tell me? Or give me another reason to believe otherwise? All I've ever seen out of you has been hostilities and the ramblings of madness. Talk to me, please? I'd like to understand. I've no devotion to Kira. I've told her like everyone else... I'm as devoted to you as you are to me - so tell me: Talk to me. Tell me what you know. I'll consider it - as everything I have before.

I have a legit reason why AFK is a decent thing - I know of a few communities that use a map that is solely for the purpose of role playing. These people come back to the same location to RP at varying times across the day, as they're in different timezones. So, the founder of the map will AFK in it, or have someone else just idle in it to keep it open for the group. But, God forbid people try to have a round-the-clock community lot available.

Geez, I just miss all the fun topics

Getting Ignored by ONE room owner as opposed to 50 potential room owners. And @York is concerned with a single person ignoring them as it's limiting player experience. The person misbehaving is the one causing the reaction, thus earning their place on ignore lists. I'm all for just putting a mental block and paying them no heed, I literally have had ZERO people on my ignore list in my seven years here. That doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to remove unruly guests from your room.

Considering that booting someone from your own room is, in essence, the same as ignoring them and rebooting the room, just more convenient for you and your guests, the fact that the denying someone access to your room acts as a block to the experience of the game diminishes. It is YOUR room and the guests within providing the experience. If someone wishes to utilize your club/wedding/room as their experience, they should, within reason, respect your wishes. If you're throwing a ceremony and wish for everyone to be able to attend, it would be terribly inconvenient to remove a pest by having to ignore them and close the room, then wait for all the guests to arrive again. Or let's say you're just going to ignore them and encourage everyone to block them- you're interrupting the ceremony further. It's not like the ability to moderate your room isn't something you can't already do. Nor is it giving someone power to deny someone access to other areas of the game. It's literally just reforming an already present capability by adding convenience and thereby removing inconveniences from the host and guests. People already willy-nilly throw people on ignore just for disagreeing with them. Sure, they can do the same with kicking. Some people give warnings, others do not. This is no different with or without the capacity to kick. The kick doesn't even have to ban or auto-ignore, but serve as a warning to the target. Again, this post is not about one particular class of villainous wretch - such as the multi-account trolls, but a warding tool that simply expedites an already possible feature against those that would end up on someone's ignore list anyway. This isn't to say I don't love a good argument. I'll troll right back in these cases, and I don't mind the unsavory types. I just get tired of seeing people who just want to be peaceful getting harassed nonstop. Ciao, -L, via Mobile

I just pray you never find someone so petty, then. I've encountered it with one person out of thousands upon thousands. (And that's my being here since 2013)

Quite what I am getting at. It gives the host no more power than already possessed. Just makes it more convenient for the host and their guests.