Kehner Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 Allow sex with clothes on (remove automatic nudity / or add an option to enable-disable it). Automatic nudity is a very annoying and unnecessary feature during sex. It prevents enjoying the sensuality and eroticism provided by bottom chlothes (panties, skirts, upskirts, shorts, pants and jeans). It is assumed that they put this function to prevent the clothing intersecting with penis during sex and may look bad and unnatural. However, only a few clothes look bad, most of them look good and natural during sex, plus we can always take them off. Panties: Clothing intersecting with penis is imperceptible and pleasant. (looks good) Skirts/Upskirts: There is no clothing intersecting. (looks good) Shorts: Clothing intersecting with penis is pleasant. (looks good) Pants/jeans: Clothing intersecting with penis is pleasant. (looks good) Tight/long skirts: Clothing intersecting with penis is not very pleasant. (looks bad) Advantages of removing auto-nude (at least on option to disable it) Sensuality and eroticism in clothing and roleplay. Natural, pleasant and progressive nudity. Oral sex, foreplay and all sex positions with clothes on. Total control of clothing during sex. Touching and stimulation of the genitals without fucking. (all sex positions as foreplay) There are just a few clothes-positions that bring intersecting and cutting problems and looks bad, but I think that is no reason to eliminate all the other options that looks really great and we could enjoy in the game. It has been requested for years and I would like them to try to fix this problem. SashaFoxy, Collier, Klusek and 23 others 25 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 (edited) Please add this finally The swimsuits are tagged as dresses and also stay on even it looks unrealistic because the texture covers the hot zone, so what's the matter that you don't allow it for skirts also, it would look very good in most cases, better than the swimsuit... i dont get it and will never understand that *sigh* Edited December 5, 2022 by Janet QValerie, SteveBlack, SusiSpecial and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My4thtry Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Agreed. I want total control of when clothes come off and stay on. I personally don't want a girl to remove her sexy skirt and underwear just cause she's giving me a BJ. As well as why do my pants disappear just cause i go down on a girl. Would be nice to go down on her with her skirt still on too! SusiSpecial, MistressBeryl, NinaFlux and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SashaFoxy Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 For any clothes in the game, we need an additional status. Now there are two statuses: dressed or removed. We need a third option - little lower \ little raise. Little drop a skirt or trousers, little lift a top or shirt. But the developers are too LAZY and won't do it, so we'll never see it in the game. They don't even do new poses, one or two a year! AnjaGER, SusiSpecial, MistressBeryl and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 4 hours ago, SashaFoxy said: For any clothes in the game, we need an additional status. Now there are two statuses: dressed or removed. We need a third option - little lower \ little raise. Little drop a skirt or trousers, little lift a top or shirt. But the developers are too LAZY and won't do it, so we'll never see it in the game. They don't even do new poses, one or two a year! 2022 they brought over "50" poses. That are 4 poses a month. That is absolutely okay. Designing poses is not easy at all. Devs did very well on that part on the game. Still much left and hope they keep going but to say they brought nothing is . Xizi and CatKatW 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MistressBeryl Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 Well we got lotta new needless olympic disciplines, but basic stuff missing. AliceEmilyM and SusiSpecial 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SashaFoxy Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 (edited) 16 hours ago, Janet said: 2022 they brought over "50" poses. That are 4 poses a month. That is absolutely okay. Designing poses is not easy at all. Devs did very well on that part on the game. Still much left and hope they keep going but to say they brought nothing is . 50 poses a year is very little. Half of them are either bad poses or bisexual shit. Good content is updated very slowly. Edited January 19 by SashaFoxy Janet, hotmaya and MistressBeryl 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) 8 hours ago, SashaFoxy said: 50 poses a year is very little. Half of them are either bad poses or bisexual shit. Good content is updated very slowly. So that are 25 poses which you don't consider as "shit" per year, that are still 2 per month. Still multiple times more than you mentioned first. That is still very good. You would know that when you would create 3D game animations or would have knowledge in this sector or game design itself. I am glad that devs not only bring content for a certain group of players and try to give everybody anything also bi and trans also when i am personally not into that. Devs would bring more updates in short time when it would make sense but when you waste more time with fixes than with developing content at the end it isn't worth because the more gets patched the more issues they have to eliminate. I also don't think they had someone hired to create poses before 2022 so they bought them on order which is more expensive/ complicated on long time what seem to change now because they suddenly bring much more poses. (Just a guess) On 1/19/2023 at 1:36 AM, SashaFoxy said: For any clothes in the game, we need an additional status. Now there are two statuses: dressed or removed. We need a third option - little lower \ little raise. Little drop a skirt or trousers, little lift a top or shirt. But that idea is great and i hope they are able to add this Edited January 20 by Janet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliceEmilyM Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I'm with everyone here who advocates us having the choice of what we take off and when. But I would love to see more short dresses and skirts available rather than the tendency towards longer skirts and dresses and for shorts. I have never understood the need for any of the gym poses, this is a sex site after all so gym poses are a waste of dev resources. (maybe the devs are fitness freaks). Sorry Sasha, you might not be bisexual but many are, they are as entitled to new poses as you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SashaFoxy Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 2 hours ago, AliceEmilyM said: I'm with everyone here who advocates us having the choice of what we take off and when. But I would love to see more short dresses and skirts available rather than the tendency towards longer skirts and dresses and for shorts. I have never understood the need for any of the gym poses, this is a sex site after all so gym poses are a waste of dev resources. (maybe the devs are fitness freaks). Sorry Sasha, you might not be bisexual but many are, they are as entitled to new poses as you are. I have nothing against bisexuals. I'm just advocating common sense. Naturals are always in the majority. And content needs to be made for the majority of people, not for the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QValerie Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 +1 to the ability to keep clothes. I can see this implemented either as a setting that prevents them coming off in the first place or them still 'automatically' coming off, but without disabling the option to put them back on again. I want to keep my skirt on! I think the short skirts idea would probably take too much dev time to be worth it unless 3DX added significant support for user-created and managed content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Sophie_ Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 How many years have we been asking for this now? I've been here since 2020 and it's been asked since then at least.... Come on @Gizmoand @Lisa... We've asked and asked and asked. I can't imagine it's too hard to stop the auto removal from happening... CatKatW, SusiSpecial, MissD and 4 others 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaitlyn1989 Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Not sure how many threads we have running this request but i'll continue to voice my support for all that give us more control over OUR clothing and accessories. Texturing, coloring, layering & when we want to wear it or remove it. Please and Thank you. CatKatW, Janet, SusiSpecial and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 (edited) I am really curious why this has not changed yet. Hopefully they are able to do it... one day.. Edited March 22 by Janet Xizi and MistressBeryl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJP Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 I am really hoping for this soon! MistressBeryl and Xizi 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatKatW Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 11 hours ago, Janet said: Hopefully they are able to do it... one day.. Best day to do it... yesterday Xizi and MistressBeryl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissD Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 This should have been implemented when they asked which features from Rochi's mod we wanted to keep JenC, MistressBeryl and Xizi 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenC Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 2 hours ago, MissD said: This should have been implemented when they asked which features from Rochi's mod we wanted to keep Indeed, I wont bother finding the old thread but it was asked there. As I have said in other threads about this subject, I have no issue with the default being as it is now, but it would be lovely to be able to "choose" what we want to have on or off, just like the DLL allowed us to. MistressBeryl, MissD, Janet and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaitlyn1989 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 9 hours ago, JenC said: Indeed, I wont bother finding the old thread but it was asked there... This thread? @Xizi was the first to request Rochi's DLL for "clothed sex" Giz even acknowledges this request will be added in a "next" patch... Hmm, what happened @ Gizmo? Xizi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xizi Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Wow it's already 4 years since then! It feels so weird to read my post from these times... Time flies so fast! Have to say though, Gizmo and team added everything from that post aside of clothed sex Don't know why they still not letting us have it... If it would be technically impossible, it would not be in DLL, right? Kaitlyn1989 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 1 hour ago, Kaitlyn1989 said: This thread? @Xizi was the first to request Rochi's DLL for "clothed sex" Giz even acknowledges this request will be added in a "next" patch... Hmm, what happened @ Gizmo? Ohh. Didn't know that. So it was planned but suddenly throwed away? Oh oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissD Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 3 hours ago, Xizi said: Wow it's already 4 years since then! It feels so weird to read my post from these times... Time flies so fast! Have to say though, Gizmo and team added everything from that post aside of clothed sex Don't know why they still not letting us have it... If it would be technically impossible, it would not be in DLL, right? Just to be clear I am just guessing with this post.. But after that patch, the "clothes bug" where other people engaging in a sexual pose without removing their clothes first, and you would see them have clothes on during sex happened. So again I am just guessing, but to me it seems like Gizmo might have misunderstood what we actually wanted, and added the "bug" instead, and it is still present in the game today, if you want to get the actual clothes synced for the people in a sexual pose you have to rejoin the room and they will be naked like they are on their screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 3 hours ago, MissD said: Just to be clear I am just guessing with this post.. But after that patch, the "clothes bug" where other people engaging in a sexual pose without removing their clothes first, and you would see them have clothes on during sex happened. So again I am just guessing, but to me it seems like Gizmo might have misunderstood what we actually wanted, and added the "bug" instead, and it is still present in the game today, if you want to get the actual clothes synced for the people in a sexual pose you have to rejoin the room and they will be naked like they are on their screen. Well, the words were "we will make clothes stay during sex in the upcoming patch". For me at least that sounds more than clear what's ment and hard to throw out of context. My guess: Something technically did not went like intended and it was not that easy to realise than thought first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaitlyn1989 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 8 hours ago, Xizi said: Have to say though, Gizmo and team added everything from that post aside of clothed sex Don't know why they still not letting us have it... If it would be technically impossible, it would not be in DLL, right? Indeed, they did. Kudos to Giz & Devs. And agreed, there must be a reasonable explanation for its absence. Is it related to the "Clothes Bug" MissD mentions? The answer... tickles this cat's curiosity, needing a scratching. MissD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissD Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 7 hours ago, Janet said: Well, the words were "we will make clothes stay during sex in the upcoming patch". For me at least that sounds more than clear what's ment and hard to throw out of context. My guess: Something technically did not went like intended and it was not that easy to realise than thought first. I don't disagree, as I said I'm just guessing, thinking that if it wasn't intentionally it would have been fixed by now as it was a "planned feature" ? Janet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now