JenC

This didn't age too well, nor quite a few others in the thread.

They have said they want it very easy for end users so the easiest way would be to not change anything for the default platform, but allow people like us that want this feature, a setting to turn off the auto removal of clothing, just like the old DLL allowed us to. C'mon Gizmo, you know there's plenty of us that want this.

Its been a wild ride, but also a very enjoyable one, watching the platform evolve and grow over the years.

Yes please.

The layout and buildings will be okay for lag, but if/when you add in all the details, a build like this will buckle under the weight... Its just not possible with this builder and the way it works.

What a strange post... 3DX is bigger and better than its ever been in its history. The population is around 10X what it was 3 years ago. I don't know what or where you're looking at but its obviously not close enough.

I highly doubt that.

Yes, the room builders must add a couple that are aimed differently so this cannot happen and the person selecting the pose spot needs to use their brain a little.

The team at 3DX have made it very clear that they want to keep the platform as user friendly as possible and that conflicts with what some users want(see second-life if you want an example of too much end user input). As soon as you go down this path, you're opening up an area that is so contentious with dozens of variables. From the platform point of view there are 2 separate issues, one is what you identify as and the other is the poses. I feel when you're making your character, there should be Female, Male and Other with an area for you to write what you identify as. Sure some will be silly as identify as a toaster or some such nonsense but for all the others that care, they will be catered to. Their name at the top of the profile can be green or grey, whatever, that is not important, the distinction is. Along with this change, a little more flexibility in the character builder so people can better reflect who they are. Poses, I would like to see a wholistic approach to this as there's a lot of issues that need to be addressed. I would dearly love to be able to choose where you are in a FF, MM and 3some instead of being like a lottery. If your a dominant and what to be in specific places within the couple or group, you need to be able to select that prior to the pose starting. Same if you are a submissive and want to offer your partner a pose, it would be wonderful to have that control within the GUI. MFF is an abomination the way it is now but I am unsure how to make it right, with only idea coming to mind is making it so all 3 have to agree before the pose activates. I highly doubt they would do it but Id love if they separated the dick poses completely so you just didn't have to deal with them at all if you're not interested in them.. It would make the whole experience so much smoother for all involved.

I see it happen all the time in all 7 default 3DX locations and its been doing it since that last update. Ive never seen it happen in a user made room.

This is the best advice anyone could receive. Forget about updates, they will come when they come. Do what you enjoy doing, move onto something else if there's nothing to enjoy.

Indeed, I wont bother finding the old thread but it was asked there. As I have said in other threads about this subject, I have no issue with the default being as it is now, but it would be lovely to be able to "choose" what we want to have on or off, just like the DLL allowed us to.

The reason it was "fixed" was there was new way the application deals with and displays names with the advent of custom name tags, so put simply, the names not being able to be hidden anymore was a side-effect of that new system being installed, rather than a bug fix.

Some nice work there, Alexa.

I've come across this problem in the past and I will try this next time. Another way of doing this is snap-step.. Using one of the lowest pieces of your world, work how approx how far you want to move it then enter that into the snap-step and then move parts up/down in parts, eg, highlight a 1/4 or so of the world and move it, then another 1/4 and so on till its all moved.

What I found is that the graphics settings which control this do seem to alter on their own at each login. To test this, click on graphics while looking at objects or others and see them change a little as you click the button. I was going to make a vid of this so you can clearly see what I mean but its not that big a deal.

I've not placed too much thought into this, but to be able to place a specific pose onto a piece of furniture would be fantastic. On top of that, using those custom pieces would be so easy for everyone.

Indeed Janet, I don't use any of these tools people make and distribute but are very appreciative of their efforts and sharing.

I had to re-read this again to make sure I didn't miss anything. This suggestion doesn't change anything in 3DX that isn't already there. The ability to buy other users gold was implemented quite some time ago, this suggestion differs in that it uses your own gold from what you have accumulated from logins or whatever.

Max makes a good point with categories because people have been doing that since day one anyway, dance rooms using "sex-fuck-suck-insert name" in the room name when they are nothing of the sort, just using those to try and boost. Categories will probably be abused in the same way, but i still see them as an efficient way to help users find what they seek easier and faster.

That will keep you busy for a while.

To answer your first question, for the first few years of 3DX the location panel was adequate as there was rarely enough worlds to make you scroll at all, then along came the World Builder and also a huge influx of new users over the past couple of years has made it so the interface is not fit for purpose anymore and needs a good overhaul.

I don't mind the default position as it is now, its clearly in place so as to make it very simple for users. What I would dearly love is the "option" to leave them on and take off manually, or being able to put them back on during the pose, like was the way with the DLL.

I most definitely noticed a change after that update.

Yes, If you want a particular texture a certain way, then you have to build in the way that allows it, or as someone else who frequents this forum says: "Adapt!" You can also find ways around it. Bricks, tiles and floorboards for example can be made Singly using a solid texture and built the way you want. Obviously the block count can get out of control on a big project but this is a good way for most.