Diana Prince

Even if 3DXC is behind a paywall, some people earn so much money that these costs would be peanuts for them.
And yes, you have the right to enter 3DXC when you pay and subscribe. But that doesn't give you the right to enter every room and don't follow the rules of this specific room.
If the room owner has "no colds" or "women / men only" rules and you don't follow them, even your subscription doesn't allow you to stay in this room then.
We had this case with a popular "videographer / photographer", who we told before that he is not wanted at our all-women event. He came nonetheless, got very agressive when he was asked to leave and whined about it even half a year later.
It would have been SO much easier to handle if there had been a "kick" button.

of course you can! 😉

Hihihi, I can see the divorce rate rising when the spouse comes to the room unexpectedly and finds the partner cheating 😂

Hihihi, I can see the divorce rate rising when the spouse comes to the room unexpectedly and finds the partner cheating 😂

And a hold hands option and a walk while holding hands option (not just for married couples).

I am not trying to vilify you by the question ' Are you implying 3DX users unable to moderate their rooms like other worlds can.'  I am confronting that premise.  One you are actively arguing against - realize it or not.
The libertarian analogy, I would love to address elswhere and discuss as I have a thing for politics you can say,  and i am not sure you understand what Liberrarian philosophy towards accountability and freedoms are. It's an interesting outlook worth reading up on.
As for 'who defines 'asshats,' that is easy.  The room owner. It isn't a democracy anymore than it is who gets to come in your real life house.
I find it difficult to believe if I was in your room engaging in conduct you don't like,  that you wouldn't want it to end and want the tools to do it.. 
Kick and room ban is an excellent place to start. In a world where there are no mods by staff active, the tools are very effective. The only way they become even better if bans become account wide bans again. But I must admit, you can kickk and ban people faster than they can make accounts and for everytine they reveal themselves you kick and ban them, don't get mad...smile. You just cost them more money and in the end they stop or you bleed them financially till they are forced too.. 
Win....win.

Just add all features from Blender! There everyting we need right thar

These would be useful to get to objects that are heavily occluded by other objects and otherwise hard to navigate to with the mouse:
Ability to name added objects and then search-and-focus on them by name Clickable object tree/list that then highlights the object in the world for editing

It would be nice if we could use the objects in a "deleting" way. Means if I would use such a "negative" cube and move it into a wall, everything this "negative cube" would touch would disappear. Resultung in a window in the wall in this case.
But I know this will be almost impossible with this editor. Wish we could use Blender and export as World files.

Currently if you are hosting and you have someone in your room you don't want there, for whatever reason, good or bad, you can Ignore them, Clear and Close your room and then re-open it and that person on that Avi will not be able to re-enter it.
A 'Boot from room' option would not give a host any more power than they already possess, it would just make the above process quicker, simpler and less inconvenient for everyone else in the room.
 

Even if 3DXC is behind a paywall, some people earn so much money that these costs would be peanuts for them.
And yes, you have the right to enter 3DXC when you pay and subscribe. But that doesn't give you the right to enter every room and don't follow the rules of this specific room.
If the room owner has "no colds" or "women / men only" rules and you don't follow them, even your subscription doesn't allow you to stay in this room then.
We had this case with a popular "videographer / photographer", who we told before that he is not wanted at our all-women event. He came nonetheless, got very agressive when he was asked to leave and whined about it even half a year later.
It would have been SO much easier to handle if there had been a "kick" button.

When a user interface design appears to be a fault and fails to meet the needs of the user (which in my case is always going to be me)...it's poor user interface design.
It's not laziness that is the problem, it just the pure irritation of it all. It makes me feel like "Arrrgghh gggrrrrr!" every time I use the list.

So you are really complaining about the 49 Cent you lost when you upped the room?

So you are really complaining about the 49 Cent you lost when you upped the room?

So you are really complaining about the 49 Cent you lost when you upped the room?

mmmhm... which is why I still believe that this donation idea is one of the worst ideas ever and that it should be scrapped and thrown to the trash where it belongs.
stuffing money and finances in a whole side of the community that was based around sharing and good will... will just lead to ruining it.

Youre going to end up with a bunch of user sites all selling tha same rooms and props they managed to snag for free.
And why do you peeps think you require a "Donation" for recognition anyway?  I would think personal ethics would prevent anyone who merely threw a bunch or D/Led props made by someone else into a Room made by someone else, to consider putting a Donate button on that room.... For recognition of what exactly LOL? Anyone who did that should do a self check  because now youre simply being greaaasey.
If ah was a Downloader of other peeps builds tha last thing id be thinking about would be sticking on a Donation button, eets like reselling a bowl of soup from a soup kitchen. 🤣
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thanks, THX...I guess the stumbling block that I'm running into is how ownership was actually managed and proven in 3DX pre-donation vs post-donation. I'll cop to using one of Amy LaRouche's places as my personal home, and filling it with a bunch of objects from other designers. If I give my modified file to a friend, without any kind of compensation, just passing on the combo of items I mixed up, am I in violation of the shared agreement? Does Amy have a right to say "Don't do that please."?
Now add to that scenario when it's a public space or open use environment...club, coffee shop, BDSM Family Fun Center, whatever. If I throw up the donation tab, with the intention that I want folks to recognize all the hard work I did putting all those elements together into a cool space, am I in violation of any agreement, shared or otherwise? Do any of the designers have a right to the few dollars I earn, assuming they have a way to prove that the elements I'm using were created by them before they were ever created or used by me? If that's the case, we're suddenly talking a radical reworking of the End User agreement as it stands now and needing some solid guidelines in place for how to document everything.
Messy doesn't begin to cover it...

you can change it by pressing "p". But only one or two points are possible, you can't choose it freely.

There seems something very emotive and judgmental about the terms alpha and beta lol.
Guys, please form two lines.  This line over here for anyone that always wanted an "alpha" penis, and this line over here for everyone that always wanted a "beta" penis.
Alpha Line: 🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♀️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️👨‍🦽🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️🧍‍♂️
  Beta Line: 🧍‍♂️

There is no doubt that the new room order is not very popular. I can see the logic behind it as it offers some limited opportunity to small rooms to compete with large and crowded rooms as now everyone needs to promote the room to get to the top, not just be at the top because the room is crowded. However,  we still see the same rooms that were full still full and the same rooms that were small remain small. So I don't think the effect has been achieved, and whoever I spoke to or heard in public chat doesn't like the new room order.
So how about a feature that users can sort the rooms using their own criteria (like size, alphabetically by name or by owner) and also search the room? That might diminish the need to promote the room for XGold, but promoting can be adjusted such that it either shows promoted rooms in different colors for some time period or it places the promoted room in a separate section.

Just some pics of some of tha props that were made fo mah Competition Entry. Also a few detail shots of tha build:)
Ah managed to scrape a 3rd place, just not a good enough build!














 
        

























 
 

Yes, when money is involved, drama is sure to follow

It can't be THAT hard to code a sort function with buttons above the column, so that we can sort by number of people, name of the room, name of the host.
And when they are at it, they could add a similiar function to the friends list, too.

It can't be THAT hard to code a sort function with buttons above the column, so that we can sort by number of people, name of the room, name of the host.
And when they are at it, they could add a similiar function to the friends list, too.