JenC

This would be great for the custom poses and furniture, its just too jarring and still missed when you try and add instructions to a specific pose somewhere. 

Hey Amy, is this build based off an old Monastery? it sort of gives off those vibes.

1 hour ago, KeshaBisha said:

Alivias best, screw the rest. C://games/3Dxchat/StandaloneWindowsBlahBlahBlahPatcher.exe. Delete that and start game as normal.

Bam! 5 second job.

The 3rd reply to this post by Yvonny listed this fix for people to try, It didnt work for my windows 7 notebook though, nor did running the exes in admin mode. I ended up copying my already patched complete directory from my computer over to it and it ran fine.

56 minutes ago, THX said:

Other places have done it for a long time, so it is logical they wouldn't allow it if they were liable in some way they can't control.

Considering theres quite a few copyrighted images on the clothing options, and people playing protected music in the rooms every day,  I cant see them being too concerned about that aspect. I think their main concern if they thought about doing it, would be server load if people went silly with it, which you know they would unless limited to x amount of pics/textures at limited KBs per pic/texture. 

But as with all things 3DX, they dont converse with us about suggestions and ideas very often so we have no idea if these things are on their radar. I feel the best we could hope for would be if they grabbed a huge stack of stock photos/paintings for us to use so they end up as in game items with no extra load, just an ID number. Same with text font items.

35 minutes ago, Lunarelf said:

So, when can we edit, upload or donate the clothes model ourselves? If devs are worried about the quality of the model, they can tell the producers the relevant parameters of the avatar. Then, like a tattoo, select the good ones and put them into the game.

You can do so now, and that is the process that is currently in place, but what gets approved is sticking point. For clothing, their vision for 3DX is that it must be suitable for sex and dancing, though the current dresses do not conform to that ideology on the sex side, so they must be just ignoring those as a mistake, though originally they did disappear when any sex pose was initiated. Still, they are very stubborn about this and their vision for the platform, disregarding anyone else that dont use the platform in the way they envisioned it should be. Heaven forbid anyone wanting a nice gown or dress below the knee... 

1 hour ago, Lexxxxi said:

And it's getting better and better. On twitter Loruna who used to do pose for game announce to stop doing pose for 3dx as Dev. are pain in the ass. many people said that how unfortunate is that after 8 years of development game have very few clothes. now say good bye to poses to as loruna is stopping.

I can attest to that, far too strict for styles, only one dimension allowed. 

1 hour ago, Lexxxxi said:

island house is no better than slum house. 3dx can do better than this. even proving houses in complex room with other users would be great so friends come house easily instead of invite all the time.

I cant bring myself to call it a house.  Its just a small box with a bed and lounge.   I deleted it the day World Builder was released. 

With the world light source, I found this out as I used a huge block up in the sky on my old Scottish back alley pub, and someone asked me why the block was up there in the sky, I said to block the moonlight so this scene was darker, which for me worked as I indented it to but for him it didn't and he argued that it never worked. That made me think what was going on, and after some mucking about found that the lower graphic settings, namely shadows, meant the lighting effects within rooms looked dramatically different depending on your settings.

As for the local light tools, it would be lovely if the blocks would cut the source, but as mentioned, I cant see it happening. We just have to work around it the best you can, usually by using lots of smaller ones over trying to illuminate an area with only one or two.

The sound boxes have been suggested before and would be a wonderful addition, having the music become louder as you move closer to the source and other effects depending on the scene would add another layer of awesomeness to the rooms.

I always thought a small city street with the in-game locales having an outside view, so you would have say the night club, then a couple of doors down the sin club and so on, and you could click on the doors to those places and enter/load into them that way as a choice. At the end of the street you could have a small wharf with a couple of boats with signs that when clicked on would take you to the island and boat locales.  So in a way, this room could act as a kind of centralised lobby to all the default in-game locales, but cool enough to be a new usable locale in its own right as well.

Yes, private group rooms stay open just like public shared rooms. Providing the owner just logs off instead of closing the room before they leave.

14 minutes ago, Anaganda said:

Let's introduce a -LOVE MAKING- rating system. We rate a person from 0-10 after each time we lay with them and the average rating forever floats above their head for everyone to point and laugh!

I like that.

52 minutes ago, Lunarelf said:

It seems not solving the basic problem: the number of players in the room are not change

actually it's sad to say but now TOP is kinda useless---you pay 300xgolds to let the room on top for 1 min, after that, no one enters. or just several people enter and afk. ifthere's some way to let the TOP be longer like 10m or even 30m, it will work a lot better.

Whatever way you want to change it, it will always be unfair to someone. I dont like using absolutes, but in this case, with the system and UI of that page the way it is, it is impossible to make a system that you seek.

As THX alluded to in his post, an interface redesign away from the current open list format would be the only way you could make it better than it currently is. The difficult part would be how many and what categories would you include as you would have to get that right before building it. While there would still be lists within those categories, they would be much smaller and all visible upon looking in those sections with no scrolling.

I wouldn't hold my breath for such a system as it somewhat takes xgold out of the picture as no listing would be hidden by the scroll bar, though I suppose there may be some merit in wanting to be on the top, still, theres no doubt it would affect the xgold a lot, and if they make a decent sum from that(we have no idea about that) then may be very reluctant to do something like this.

How about a FF pose like this that can be used anywhere, the guys have 3 different choices they can use anywhere and the women have none.

4 minutes ago, Xizi said:

As far as I remember, anal/vaginal poses with pants on was not looking very neat lol. But... 

1. By-default clothes was disappearing during the pose, so no one was forcing people to do it like this.

2. Oral sex and spanking was/will be really neat.

3. Underskirt sex! With skirts, not only with dresses. 

This is correct, nothing was changed or modified , all it did was give an option to click on and off the clothes if you wanted to, just like you can right now with shoes and stuff.

While some cool options would be wonderful, all I want is for it to be like the old DLL,  the option to remove and put on clothing in any pose at any time.

I hear you, but I cannot see a way to change the status-quo. The way I see it is those same masses will vote for their fuck-room, leaving you in the same spot youre in now? No better or worse?

While this wouldnt fix it either, I truly believe if they had some kind of drop down contextual  button on the room listing that allows for a lot more info so people can list who or if theres a DJ and or Dancers, what type of music being played, rules, etc etc, maybe even a spot for a small photo, so people can get a better idea what the room is before they enter. This would guide people much better than what we have now?

Yes please.

Yes, as Yaelle said, been there from day one. I am certain they know about it, but may not want to spend the time to fix it? I wouldnt plan on a fix anytime soon, so best find a way to work around it if its causes any issues for you.

The trees also have this effect if you reshape them using the Volume Scale tool, which is not usually a problem but the "village in the trees" I was making, it caused me so many headaches that I abandoned the project..

Yes you can, I too had trouble until I realised that the existing lounge/bed/chair click-spot is a little higher than the surface of the object, so when you add the template over it, you need to have it a little higher than you would if applying it to a custom object.

You invite who you want into Group Chat. Once in Group Chat, they will be able to see and click on your room to join it at the top of the Shared User Worlds list.

7 hours ago, Yaelle said:

It's the best apartment I've seen in this game ! just awesome !

I dont often look at the rooms there but after your comment I went and had a look and wow, very nice. 

They could be both 

11 hours ago, AliceM said:

It's high time to make such a button! This will add attractiveness to the game and eliminate conflict situations.

It wont eliminate conflict and its very easy to see that this will actually be a new source of conflict and aggravation. But, the good from it will outweigh the bad and it is a much needed feature.

The 3DX platform is not stable, the 3DX platform is still under attack, nothing other than getting the platform solid is on the agenda. 

The question 

2 hours ago, Twiggy said:

There are a number of reasons that Gizmo and Lisa may have stopped with the pose editor and for those that think they were never really serious on it they should think why did Gizmo create this thread. The teasers he gave did very much seem to be work in progress for a pose editor actually being worked on in the game environment. There are 2 or 3 good ones available in the Unity store and it appeared he was working with one of them improving it and making it fit the game.

Early in this thread you find where several of us were trying to figure out how they could implement a pose editor in 3DXChat, as to how they could have it work. For example they could not have every pose created by users get added to the existing menus and have them appear the same as any new pose created by the devs do now, the menus would just become massive and unusable. We talked about maybe they would have it so you only got poses that a room owner owned when you were in that room or having to click on each user to be able to see their use their poses as they do in other games. 

The thing is is that it could be possible they are having difficulties in finding a way to implement a pose editor without it being to big a strain on servers or Unity may not supply a way for them to be able to just have it be supplied in our rooms. 

What would be really good is if they gave us an explanation to things like this and let us know if we could still expect to have it added some time in the future. Saying it hasn't been worked on for 2 years doesn't really say it has been completely dumped or why it hasn't been worked on.

It could also be that Gizmo has been trying to find a way to stop people from hijacking his script as it seems there are now 2 copies of the game around. From the teasers he seemed to have put a lot of work into the pose editor he was working on so I could understand him maybe being worried about it just getting hijacked if he did add it. Looking at the teasers he had done some very advanced addons to what is around and I could understand him being protective of it.

I just wish they would let us know the reason it has been put on hold as there are a lot of people that come in these forums that could possibly help find an answer to the problem.

@Gizmo and @Lisa Can you please let us know why it has been put on hold?

The question was asked during the height of the ddos attacks so the answer would of been the same no matter what was asked.