Sophisticated Depravity

Sad but realistic fact. Even though these rooms are annoying and slowly killing the game, there's very little we can do about them. Apparently sgd doesn't think this is against the rules as it makes them profitable. On the other hand, all players can do is block these rooms → get a smaller room list → quit the game because they are too bored. But no one takes this seriously: hey, SGD got subscriptions, dance groups got money, host got populations, everyone is forced to be happy or quit

It starts with just few dance groups+ dj——nobody expect that 2 years later, the gamemode totally turned into :
* build a box with dancefloors and  make the details as minimum as possible, but set the room's name/theme as vulgar as possible, then fill the room with tons of unnecessary light pollution.
*put tons of snacks in it for extra earnings, even it doesn't fit the theme 
* invite/ become/ hire dancebots and fill the room with it
* people come, virtually dancing and drinking, became a digital dancing zombie
*M U N E H 
It's not hard to understand now why many content creators leaving this game: The room you spent 2 weeks  on it and handmaking everything only have few visitors, but boxes with cold and dancebots always have 50+ populations, how nice

Well... as far as I know: When you block the owner of the room, the room will disappear as well. I know, its not the best solution, but I think its the only thing we get in that matter.
And I agree. I was never a fan of those dance groups stuff. When it started with just a couple of people doing it, it was fine but now, it totally escalated.

That is what i had in mind, a reverse favorite.

I never visit rooms with a lot of people in them anymore, simply because it seems to be a 99.9999999% probability that it`s full of bots, "dancers" and other hired "help", so earlier i went to a room with 14 people in it, thinking it was a safe bet that i would not see any "dancing" bots in it, but i was wrong, there where 12 of them, plus the "DJ" and the owner.
I get that some of you don`t care that they are there, but some of us do, and I for one am so tired of this shit i want to throw up, so in the name of all that is good in this world, can we pleeeeeease have the ability to block those rooms from the list ??

I would like to suggest that there should be a possibility that we could do like avatar profiles profiles/rules for rooms.
When you open a room, there should be this possibility.
And the guests would have a button to read this text then.
I think for all kinds of roleplay and what has to happen in that room, what is the concept, what is the fantasy in that room, such an introductory text is essential.
I've been missing that since the start of 3dx.
Dear thanks, mei

This will not fix the problem.  A "Tg" symbol on the poses doesn't tell us which position in the pose we will be in, nor if the game is going to add a penis onto us.

Right, and the pics of the poses on the invites are so small I cannot see whose avatar will have what genitals in the pose.  It doesn't even give us any way to tell which female (or male or futa) we are in the pics.

The main issue in regard to the Bolded part up there. Is the fact that the poses that do that. Are not marked in any way. 

It's annoying for non-binary people and trans people to. Quite alot non-binary and trans people don't like it when there penis is not permanent... don't like it only being on when having sex and only erect. 

Having a trans-woman and trans-man options are good for all players. 
-Trans women who like having a penis
-Women who don't want one forced on them
-People who's fantasy is being a woman with a penis (futa)
-Trans women who don't want a penis  
-Trans men who want a vagina and not a penis
- ect ect ect
Uniting the genitalia from the avi as a whole and making it a option in character creation is such a simple thing (Given you will have to changes clothes to add bulges) and it will solve a most of the complaints people have, trans, non-binary and women alike. In this everyone is on the same side.
 

I do totally agree ! ! thats why I add this to my  IN GAME profile > >For the Penislovers, as RL woman I dont have and dont want a penis,
same on here, I am not willing to use a penis or strapon on any person in this world<<<  nonetheless there are poses that even if you dont want it, there will be a penis attached,if you like it or not , but its 100%  absolutely against my will  ! !    It should be in game possible that there will never be a penis attached to a FEMALE avatar, not with a sexpose ,not on any other way , just NEVER  ! !  

I saw a lot of people recently talking on forums about how nice it would be to add a transgender option for our avatars so I think it’s time to rise this topic again.
Pros:
No more confusing situations when female avi suddenly grows a cock. No more questions “Are you futa?” to women and no guys going insane because they did not bother to read profile of TG or futa player and saw a penis. Transgender avis can be indicated with ⚤ symbol near their name, other name color or simply (T). So no more confusion. “Interested in” section in our profiles should also have an option to choose men, women and transgender. Transgender avis finally can have a proper working pubic hair that actually grows on top of a cock, not inside of it. When/if devs will add an ability to switch before limp/hard cock it will be easier to add it to transgender avis without bothering regular female avis with it. Though for female avis wet/dry pussy state can be added as well, but it’s a subject of another thread and anyway it will be more convenient if genders are separated. Transgender avis can get a better representation of their body in clothes. For example, a cock under skirt/dress, when they are not wearing underwear. Or underwear bulges. Cons:
Some people with futa fantasy will not be able to grow a cock in the middle of the sex or switch futa/female in general.  

Of course you don't forget that Strapon ara part of the lesbian erotica. The disturbing stuff is mainly the 'futa cock". Strapon should be default

what about a sexual intension slider - like the sex speed slider-  for all genders :
a nipple slider - low/flat  to perky/pointing up 
a penis slider -limp/ hard to vibrating pulsating hard !
 
that ll be fun  what do you think ?

I know this has been addressed in the past, usually nested in other update requests.
But why is it that the speed sliders default to midspeed? It's not realistic, and starting slow is much more erotic.
Anyone agree/disagree? 

I'm trying to figure out who might of invented the "feature" Colds.   And along with that who introduced "No Chat".  Last time I checked the game is 3DXChat.  Soooo... Come to 3DXChat where we celebrate No Chat rooms that feature Cold invites.  
I get why it's become popular.  People can't bear having anyone see/hear them chat.  And frankly IMHO, it's a guy thing.  When will they ever learn?    
I'm gonna propose that they change the game's name to 3DXNOChat.  Home of the Cold and land of the Demented.  
** Note to self **  bout time to blog about WC.  

In the beginning, when I first starting building I would host rooms without staff I had 90 plus guests.  But after I started sharing the ABC fonts that I made for my rooms, my guest numbers dropped.  They didn't just drop because others were using my designs, but because those of clubs used staff to bulk up the numbers,
Recently, I have visited clubs where 99% of the room numbers are actually staff,  be that the Host, Greeters, DJ's or even Dance Teams.  I have seen Dance Teams made up of 30-40 players  Plus most clubs hire 3-4 Dance Teams.
So when the 3DX Devs make it possible to sort rooms by numbers, it doesn't show that rooms are any good, it just shows how many friends have gotten together.  For those who boast about having a room with 150 players, that doesn't really prove your room is any good, when 99% of the players in your room are Staff.
A good room will usually only have about 5%-10% staff
 
And I actually design logos for Clubs & Dance Teams

Sorry, but "this" is really silly. I wouldn't even pay 50 xgold to enter a room. I'd much rather send a nice gift to good friends or my partner than support such nonsense.

You really think you need Dj's, dance teams and even greeters while you push your room like crazy? That's your free choice, but I've never been into that kind of nonsense, and I never will be. And I'd certainly never would pay for this.

But of course that's just my opinion.

Well that's better of course, but its still terrible. 
Its still means that people should have pay additional currency for a basic game functionality. It may be acceptable in some "free" to play money drain game (especially on mobiles where people are believe that its normal and its how things should be), but its totally not okay for a honest p2p game.
About the rest of your post, its all about making the game worse for a regular player and better for dolphins and whales, making game less of honest subscription based p2p venue and more of a mobile game-style """free""" to play shit where you need to pay for everything. Next step would be VIP subscription and additional customization stuff for xgold, I am pretty sure you would enjoy it lol.

Of course sex rooms are shocking in a sex game... rofl

Just like @Xizi said... This idea is a real no-go, a red line that developers should never cross.

Rooms have to stay open without the owner, otherwise disconnects and other emergencies would interfere with running it. Pay per hour might be useful.
For alts, I would suggest making them a feature that is cheaper than separate accounts and performs better, but they also don't count toward room numbers. I think the only other way to stop the alt problem is to require a door charge, so if you stay longer than 15 mins in a room you pay 50 gold. It would cost them 2000 more gold per hour to run 40 alt accounts, and their guests might be less inclined to spend their 50 gold at a place that uses fake accounts.
But that's basically a whole different game at this point.

I have a colored name, bought it when the prices got reasonable. I am not feeling misled or scammed in a slightest. I knew/know that many people don't like this new feature at all and have it disabled and I am fully support their right to do so.  It was like this since the very moment when colored names was added to the game.
Is this some kind of bad joke? So a regular paying customer, who don't buy xgold, just pays the subcription - have a right to stay 300/50*15 = 90 mins in public rooms? 90 mins in public rooms and then go away and do something else in private because few ego-driven room-hosts are having a bad feelings because of unfair competition? Like... Lets wreck the game quality for 90% of playerbase to please few dozens of room hosts? Great idea.
 

The feature to disable colorful names was introduced in the same update as a colorful names themselves. People was knowing what they paying for.
No one forcing you or anyone else to use room boost. 

I don't feel I should be forced to see the colored nametags you freely purchase. Same thing with the rooms you choose to boost.
I'm very happy with the colored tag disable option. Same with the future sorting/favoriting of rooms.
Anyway I would give you a point regarding rooms list... despite the sorting, the boosted room should stay on top (or on top of the non-favorites, if this feature is used).