Leaderboard

Speaking about settings in editor for builders, I would love to see an option to turn off a flying camera in the room.

Yeah, it was my understanding that the bug was related to negative z-axis values, and like JenC said it wasn't so much 'fixed' as it was bypassed by a new nameplate display method. But regardless of that, I want to support the sentiment of this post 100% ... The changes have broken a number of functionally unique rooms, from Hunt Mazes, to Roleplay rooms and Anonymous Sex/Partner Sharing rooms. It was a bug that added experiential value to the game, was a source of emergent gameplay ideas, and to the best of my knowledge hurt nobody in the process. I think it's important to get the simple functionality, of a Builder being able to toggle nameplate display On or Off for their rooms, back again... The old bug should be functionally included as a feature in this new display system.

Hosted by LauraTWK, and featuring a revolving cast of guests, the 3DXChat Text-To-Speech Podcast will feature discussion of the hottest topics and most pressing matters for the 3dxchat community. You can find the podcast at many of your favourite places for listening to podcasts. Please do like and follow us on whichever is your preferred platform. Links below: Amazon Music - https://amzn.to/3HFODIc Anchor - https://anchor.fm/3dxttspod Apple Podcasts - https://apple.co/3baqbCo Buzzsprout - https://www.buzzsprout.com/2009346 Google Podcasts - https://bit.ly/3OIqFyc Podchaser - https://bit.ly/3OmtwwR Podvine - https://bit.ly/3QNoJGn RadioPublic - https://bit.ly/3yhevqt Spotify - https://spoti.fi/3y1vrBk And you can follow all of the latest podcast announcements on Twitter or join us on Discord to get involved with future podcast episodes.

Allow sex with clothes on (remove automatic nudity / or add an option to enable-disable it). Automatic nudity is a very annoying and unnecessary feature during sex. It prevents enjoying the sensuality and eroticism provided by bottom chlothes (panties, skirts, upskirts, shorts, pants and jeans). It is assumed that they put this function to prevent the clothing intersecting with penis during sex and may look bad and unnatural. However, only a few clothes look bad, most of them look good and natural during sex, plus we can always take them off. Panties: Clothing intersecting with penis is imperceptible and pleasant. (looks good) Skirts/Upskirts: There is no clothing intersecting. (looks good) Shorts: Clothing intersecting with penis is pleasant. (looks good) Pants/jeans: Clothing intersecting with penis is pleasant. (looks good) Tight/long skirts: Clothing intersecting with penis is not very pleasant. (looks bad) Advantages of removing auto-nude (at least on option to disable it) Sensuality and eroticism in clothing and roleplay. Natural, pleasant and progressive nudity. Oral sex, foreplay and all sex positions with clothes on. Total control of clothing during sex. Touching and stimulation of the genitals without fucking. (all sex positions as foreplay) There are just a few clothes-positions that bring intersecting and cutting problems and looks bad, but I think that is no reason to eliminate all the other options that looks really great and we could enjoy in the game. It has been requested for years and I would like them to try to fix this problem.

Hello, as 3DXChat builder I have some suggestions for this game. Tools: Mirroring: This feature really needed for any builder as it will save time while trying to create custom shapes. (No, turning it 180 degrees does not give same result all the time!) Other: Multiple sizing within editing values: Should be able to modify multiple objects just by editing transform value as you can do on single objects. Color: Selecting a singular object should pick its color automatically on color picker! And heres some bugs I encountered: Bugs: When I duplicate an object from a grouped object, it becomes part of that group. I have seen this many times and its really annoying. Sometimes when you copy a light, you cannot see lighting, it fixes up when I visit room. Color: Selecting a color from my saved color list does not pick it on color picker. (See below) Hex value does not get updated either, its annoying again. I have seen such great builders in this game and 3DXChat needs to favor these builders, supplying more tools. See ya on another forum post maybe!

Thanks for the info, I didn't know it was changed. I haven't done it in a long time. Sorry for the misinformation OP. Then I also agree there should be a setting in the editor for the building designers.

That was the situation before one of the last updates. Since then the names are displayed no matter the "depth" of the sea level / ground.

50 poses a year is very little. Half of them are either bad poses or bisexual shit. Good content is updated very slowly.

Is this some kind of bad joke? So a regular paying customer, who don't buy xgold, just pays the subcription - have a right to stay 300/50*15 = 90 mins in public rooms? 90 mins in public rooms and then go away and do something else in private because few ego-driven room-hosts are having a bad feelings because of unfair competition? Like... Lets wreck the game quality for 90% of playerbase to please few dozens of room hosts? Great idea. But it's not 50 gold per 15 minutes. I said if you stay longer than 15 mins, you get charged 50 for the evening. The idea would be: Non-club rooms have a player limit of 20. Small club rooms have a player limit of 40, and cost 1000 gold per hour to run. Small club rooms have no player limit, and cost 2000 gold per hour to run. Joining a club room is 50 gold for a guest for the night. At 10 mins, users are prompted to pay to stay. If they haven't paid by 15 minutes, they're removed. Remove boosting entirely but list clubs (paid rooms) in a section at the top above other rooms. Instead of putting numbers by rooms, use dots to show the range of users. No dot for less than 10 users, then dots representing more players than 10, 20, 40, 80. What happens: The 40 dancer alts pay 50 gold once, but that's all they can pay. So the first hour is paid for, but those alts add no money for subsequent hours, so the room owner must attract new unique guests, or just lose 2k per hour. 150 free xGold per day means visiting 3 clubs for free. Clubs will run shorter hours and aim for higher quality experiences to attract the needed players, instead of faking their popularity with alts. Not showing room numbers probably means less competition. Small rooms that "don't care about numbers" and aren't "ego-driven" experience the exact same game they do now! As I said, it would be a whole different game. These features would be a start, but they would also benefit from additional economy design (bartending, sending gold, worthwhile gold purchases, etc.) and better room sorting by room type as I mentioned. Sorry for derailing my own thread.

Exactly, there are different players with different preferences. The game is used in several very different ways. Clubbers/Hosts: Like to have their rooms visible to throw big parties. Cold: Like to find big fuck rooms with lots of acronyms in their titles. Explorers/Builders: Like to visit builds from bottom to top. Gamers: Like to find board games and mazes that add an extra element to the fuckin. Roleplayers: Like to find dedicated RP rooms to create a character and story. The top two categories probably make up more than half of players, while the remainder are scattered among other smaller rooms. The biggest problem with the new sorting feature is that it doesn't particularly help anyone and appears to invalidate gold boosts entirely. For the record, the current system of boosting and advertising sucks. Which is, again, because rooms with different purposes are being shown in the same list. People looking for clubs are looking for clubs. People looking for 100-player cold rooms are looking for 100-player cold rooms. People looking for 2-player quickie rooms are looking for 2-player quickie rooms. Showing them all in the same list serves absolutely nobody and encourages everyone to effectively waste gold, which is predatory (a.k.a. scammy). Any system that enables players to waste gold, whether they know it or not, is predatory. Sort feature is the right answer. The favorites filter is fine (does it save rooms by player, or name, or just instance?). The numbers filter is okay, but only if it preserves boosting functionality in a meaningful way, otherwise you're screwing boosters like before. What you need to add is a type filter. Let us declare a room type when we open: club/sex/game/rp/other. Then players can look for what they want much easier. I believe I first suggested room filters on the forums about 18 months ago. So I'm glad the devs have decided they're worthwhile, but the most important filter to add is room type. Please do it.

I don't feel I should be forced to see the colored nametags you freely purchase. Same thing with the rooms you choose to boost. I'm very happy with the colored tag disable option. Same with the future sorting/favoriting of rooms. Anyway I would give you a point regarding rooms list... despite the sorting, the boosted room should stay on top (or on top of the non-favorites, if this feature is used).

Episode #2 - Well, that escalated quickly! I take a moment to reflect on the community's reaction to the debut episode of the podcast and to give some insight on where things may go from here. Episode now available: https://spoti.fi/3unGgeO

Hi Gizmo! Glad you like it! I hadn't really considered that but, if people ask for it, I suppose I could. I've experimented with quite a few different text-to-speech services but I went with Murf.ai because, even though some others have a higher number of good sounding voices, this one was best for creating conversational audio with multiple voices. Laura xx

Very interesting! Please tell me, do you plan to post the text versions of the episodes? And what software do you use to convert text to speech? Thanks for this episode and podcast Best wishes for success!

Episode #1 - Update Anticipation I am joined in the studio by SexxxyJessica and MaxNorman to discuss all things related to the upcoming update; when to expect it, what content has already been teased for it and what else they hope may also been in there. Episode now available: https://spoti.fi/3mY7QLs

Valentine's Day Giveaway Here's your chance to win 3DXChat XGold and a Lovense toy! Prizes: 3 x Lovense toy of your choice (excluding Sex Machine) 3 x 100K XGold 6 winners will be chosen at random To enter now, check out the ongoing Twitter giveaway here (ends 15 Feb, 23:59 UTC) Good Luck & Happy Valentine's Day! With love, 3DXChat & Lovense team

Rooms have to stay open without the owner, otherwise disconnects and other emergencies would interfere with running it. Pay per hour might be useful. For alts, I would suggest making them a feature that is cheaper than separate accounts and performs better, but they also don't count toward room numbers. I think the only other way to stop the alt problem is to require a door charge, so if you stay longer than 15 mins in a room you pay 50 gold. It would cost them 2000 more gold per hour to run 40 alt accounts, and their guests might be less inclined to spend their 50 gold at a place that uses fake accounts. But that's basically a whole different game at this point.

What about amazon?