Jump to content
3DXChat Community

SuzyShine

Members
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

4 Followers

About SuzyShine

  • Birthday 11/01/1981

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.thesoppho.org/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Bavaria
  • Interests
    Chatting, interesting conversations, sexy talk, role play

Recent Profile Visitors

3,009 profile views

SuzyShine's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

39

Reputation

  1. Dear @Gizmo! And also to the Co-Stars @Loruna, @Lisa and @Takisa ... Thank you for the youngest update, you did great. But I also know, that you are mostly not listening, Gizmo. And I know, that you are a straight man with a penis, that's okay. Nobody is perfect But please: The game is getting more and more frustrating for lesbian women (or also men playing a girl in a lesbian relationship, and I can tell, there are a lot of them!). Please understand: A pose with a dick isn't really a FF-pose! That's hilarious after so many years! A girl rubbing her penis on bed, really? Is this your idea of female sexuality? Cuddle pose for the pool – with a dick between the breast? An oral FF-pose ... where the one girl sucks the dick of the other? Hmmm ... This isn't Watergate, it's Dick-Gate! When will there be more poses for girls only? For them to enjoy their girl-on-girl-love? Without a dick! Okay, sometimes it's fun to use a strap-on for some rough games. But a lesbian woman is mostly interested in vaginas and breasts, not dicks. A lesbian woman is interested in a more sensual way instead of ramming the partner with a huge prick. I want to touch, to lick, to squeeze, to suck (not on dicks!), to kiss ... I need fingers, hands, tongue, breast, nipples, labia, vulva, ass ... a dick isn't exciting me, sorry I checked the updates of the last 5 years (since beginning of 2015!) and counted the number of poses (see the appended PDF) for self-love, couple-sex and group-sex: With the "use" of a dick and without a dick – ignoring the sex of the participants of the pose. The poses without a dick/strap-on is what I would call a real lesbian pose. The numbers are speaking for themselves: We received 86 poses with dick = 77%, 26 poses without a dick = 23%. Self-sex poses have the ratio of 7:4 with dick vs. without. We have 63 couple poses with a dick, 19 without. (And a lot of the poses with dick were published as FF-poses!) With group it's even worse: 16 with dick vs. 3 without. So pleeeeaaassseeee: I am reading all those begging of lesbian women since nearly 2 years. We need more *real* girl-on-girl-poses, and also real FFF-poses are very welcome. And yes, "real" means without a dick! You are all doing such a good job and we love your game, we are loyal and don't demand much. But please, give us the real girl stuff, will you? Thank you in advance, a lot of kisses poses.pdf
  2. If you were a lesbian or bi woman, who felt in love with another woman in the game, who later turns out to be a male, you might understand why many of the women in the game are so annoyed by the fact, that so many men are playing as women to improve their chances with other women. If I, as a lezzo, want to flirt or have sex with a fascinating woman, I want to flirt or have sex with her ... not with a him.
  3. I see your point and can't contradict, that's a good thing So let's keep hoping that there will be more poses for MM/FF/TT ... the last updates were promising
  4. Awwww, that'll be a good connection for spending time horizontally, ehem , hahaha, but I won't battle with an Aries, never!
  5. Maybe I am stuck in a bisexual bubble, but when looking at the Sin or other places I get the feeling that the game is full of lesbian or bisexual women ... Often 70% of the crowd in the Sin are women, about a half of the married ones are married to other women. But maybe those are all men in disguise to increase their chances, lol Besides: Disadvantaging a certain group because of its lesser size is not a good argument. Even though the majority might be straight this shouldn't be a reason to treat the others worse, because those pay the same money. Therefore, I used the request: "stop being so heteronormative", because that's even not fair if the straight folks are the majority. It's also not about "we want to have more FF and FFF poses", it's a question, why it isn't possible to offer certain poses like sitting on the submissive partner for all gender? Why are five of the 13 MF vaginal poses not available for lesbian or trans/futa, as they could use them also with strap-on or girl's penis? Why on the other hand are 5 of 11 FF oral poses with a penis while lesbians in the reality have mostly oral sex? Also, the FF poses on the chair and in the pool are with a penis, there is no pose to lick pussy on the chair or, even worse, in the pool. Why is there only one cumshot pose for FF/Trans/Futa but 3 for MF? And why cumshot, why not squirt for FF? And since when is scissoring a female fetish? It's one of the most common lesbian poses and should be found under "vaginal". The other fetish pose is again with a penis, why can't we fumble with our feet in the vagina of our beloved? And not talking about the fact that for years the female breast seems to be completely uninteresting for making love Yes, I get it, I hear it every time, too difficult to develop because of different breast sizes ... Don't get me wrong, I like dick, lol, I am married to a man with one But my question is: Why can't the devs offer some existing MF poses not also for FF/Trans and why are there still so less "pure" FF (and of course FFF) poses? Or ask gay men, the situation for them is even worse. It is like it is. But it's not fair and I don't like inequality ('cause I am a Libra)
  6. Paulina, you are so right! Please, dear Gizmo & team, stop being so "heteronormative" (what a word ) and stop looking at us players as easy to sort into drawers! I recently added Bob, the bot, to try the new poses ... And I have been shocked, that there are so much more poses for heterosexual couples than for gay or lesbian And a lot of them could be used with every gender, male, female and diverse. For instance, why can't I as a dominant lesbian sit on my submissive girl, if that should be my bias? Why is this ... and a lot of other poses limited to MF? Makes no sense and it seems to me also discriminatory. Or why there is only one cum shot for FF, although there are a lot of trans girls out there, whereas with MF there are three, and a gay couple have zero poses for the final shot? Another point: Step in any room with a lot of people and look at the relationship status of the females: They are mostly married with other women! (I know that statistically it isn't possible, that there are so many lesbians in the game and I'd suppose that a lot of girls in the game are in real life men, but never mind...) I haven't had yet enough time but I wanted to make a statistics, how many of the married women are gay or at least bi and married to another woman! A quick look into the Sin: 11 girls, 4 married, 2 with another woman, 2 with a man, a 50% lesbian quote for the married ones. (Hopefully I will find some time in the near future to make a real statistic about the phenomena of married lesbian couples...) You think "discriminatory" is too harsh? Well, just give it a count (without poses who are just a switch between both gender): * MF poses: foreplay 15, vaginal 13, anal 10, oral 10, cum-shot 3, bisexual (?) 4, fetish 1 = 56 poses overall * FF poses: foreplay 14, vaginal 8, anal 11, oral 11, cum-shot 1, fetish 2 = 47 poses overall * MM poses: foreplay 14, anal 16, oral 8, cum-shot 0 (lol ), fetish 1 = 39 poses overall * MMF poses: 6 poses overall * MFF poses: 7 poses overall * FFF poses: 6 poses overall * MMM poses: 0 poses overall So please: Stop thinking in old role models and straight gender and let the players decide, which pose they want to use as long as there are no limitations because of the physics of the bodies of the AVIs. The world is colorful, not either black or white Thank you
  7. Hey Max, I can't confirm that for my system. I "only" – LOL! – have the flickering issues. Mouse is working without holding CTRL+SHIFT and my profile page and friend list seem to be totally normal. But because user rooms are flickering that much I can only play in the official rooms like Sin or Love Island and that's a huge limitation. No words from the dev ... although the money of Mac users is as good as the money of regular Windows users
  8. A lot of Mac users have the same issues: - Parallels Desktop: (+) camera rotating with wireless mouse is working, but (–) flickering in user worlds. - PlayOnMac: No way to get a 64bit app running - Bootcamp: (+) no flickering in the rooms, but (–) camera can't be rotated with wireless mouse What makes me wonder – therefore I am asking you again – why is there no flickering or graphical issues within the Sin, the Vortex or on the Yacht, within rooms like Love Island nearly no issues, at the official beach some issues but manageable, whereas user rooms are horrible or even not visitable? There must be something special which causes that flickering, because why isn't it flickering at the Yacht with a lot of sky and a lot of water with all the reflections? And if you could tell, what causes the flickering in those other rooms, you could make a switch in the options for Mac users?
  9. First of all: I love it, that although we Mac users are a very, very tiny community within the 3DX family, we stay together! Thank you so much Tom for your assistance! A lot of your hints really help. I know have the game windowed in a smaller resolution. I can also state when using 3DXChat within Parallels Desktop, that you have to leave Coherence Mode, otherwise you won't be able to rotate the camera by mouse. So I am lucky and I have a brand-new iMac with big balls So I don't have much hardware issues and also no problems with overheating CPU. The anti-flickering trick with dragging down the window worked for me with the common beach! And I again can say that I have nearly no issues in the common rooms of the game like the Yacht or the Sin Club, I can play there perfectly. But in user worlds it's mostly just horrible! In the Character Editor there are also absolutely no issues with flickering! Therefore to the developers, dear Gizmo: Why is that, that there is no flickering in a room like the Yacht with a lot of water and sky ... whereas user worlds are that much flickering that it's not playable for Mac users? There has to be a reason!
  10. Dear Gizmo ... and all the other Mac users! What I can say is: Within general locations of the game like Sin Club, Love Island etc. I have less issues with the flickering or nearly none! But in User Worlds it's between "worse" and "horror". Above all very complex Worlds like Paradise Creek are unplayable because of the flickering. My own room had issues, so I reloaded the standard room. There I have some issues, but it's kinda okay. Is this helping you? Is this giving you a hint where you maybe could develop a switch for Mac users to switch off a special (sky?) effect for stopping the flickering and glitching? I also have to set the graphics very low, otherwise it's lagging and also my other apps are slowing down – although I have 32 Gig RAM and a 7-core processor. Those are my current settings with which the game is playable on a Mac (with Parallels Desktop) - at least at the general locations like the Sin Club:
  11. I was able to get the 64bit version running on Windows 10 under Parallels Desktop 13. I have no problem with turning the camera by mouse, although the speed of the turning is too fast for my taste. Is there a possibility to somehow slowing it down? Still, flickering in rooms is an issue!When I'm in the character editor, there's no flickering, everything looks great.Even in rooms that represent interiors, such as the Sin Club, it does not flicker. Only when sky is visible, the view flickers, creating stripes and bars on the screen.This is even worse when the avatar is moved.Also, I have the impression that it is worse with darker skies, with lighter skies, it seems less flickering. I have changed all graphics settings to the lowest setting, so there are at least no lags and the game is running smoothly. Dear Gizmo, can you come up with a solution for this flickering problem? I do not give up hope!
  12. Ghost partners is not only about more poses ... it's above all the only real possibility for gay and lesbian players to have group sex! In the game we lesbians don't have a single FFF pose ... but with ghost partners we have! So as long as Gizmo and his crew aren't providing us FFF/MMM or FFFF/MMMM poses we need ghost partners from the Rochi DLL sooooo much
  13. Thank you Gizmo! It's really nearly depressive ... we Mac users played your game for months, some folks for years, we have friends in the game, loving partners ... and now we are sitting all alone at the empty beach I'm trying to get the 64bit version running via BootCamp, but have to wait for a delivery of a Windows 10 to install. And although we all know, that 3DXChat is a Windows PC only game, we Mac users entered it and are paying for it, because in your FAQ everyone can read, that it is working also on Mac ;-) You have to admit that. Without that passage and that opportunity, given in the FAQ, no Mac user would ever have paid for access. And because my account is paid until December I really want to get it working again, because staying at the 32bit version isn't an option ... because it's an empty, dead desert!
  14. Thank you Tom, that gives me hope! So I'll try it with BootCamp, keeping fingers crossed, that it will work. It's so awefull: Playing since month, established friendships, even be in love with someone ... and now I should never meet them again in the game? Would make me more than sad.
  15. The issues are enormous, because playing without being able to rotate the camera by mouse is no fun. Plus rooms are "flickering" in Parallels. Another user told me, that also when installing a "real" Windows 10 with BootCamp this rotation problem still exists. So all the Mac players, who are paying the same monthly amount of money, have no possibility to play the 64bit game and because the devs are shutting down the 32bit game we are even not able to stay in the old version, because all of our friends are no longer there and it's like sitting in an empty desert. Is this it? So there is no way for Mac users to play the 64bit version, which will be in future the only version: - Wine (PlayOnMac) can't handle 64bit games. - Parallels Desktop: camera can't be rotated, rooms are flickering, unplayable - BootCamp: camera can't be rotated Dear devs, you have to change your FAQs. 3DXChat can no longer be played on a Mac. So future Mac users won't step in the trap and pay for something which can't be used. And yes, I know that it "3DXChat is designed to run on Windows PC only", thank you Gizmo for treating Mac users like dull persons I have been playing the game for almost a year and it has been fine. Now it's over. So I and all the other Mac users have to leave if you are not willing to look after a solution!
×
×
  • Create New...