chrisWT

No of course not I am just pointing out that a lot of people are just looking for cookies, but doing similar RPing themselves, and that doing that can makes people think that some of these things are ok when they aren't really.

Primal fetish sounds a lot like a type of none consensual RP to me. Its exactly the type of thing I am talking about, since it includes none consensual acts by definition. Animals can't consent, and the whole no rules just passion, lust, and rage thing sounds like being forced is perfectly fine in that RP.

The TOS imply that all none consensual RP is banned. I does seem that the Devs enforce it as only meaning the word rape in room names though. Which really is construction an empty box with a single word in it. Its really not doing much to remove people from the community who are into that, or protect anyone. Just having people use a different word for the same RP is worse in my opinion at least people understand what rape is all about. 

Lets all remember how Rape was banned in the first place here. A futa dom came on the forum and said that the seeing the word in room names was triggering her sub who worked at a women’s shelter in Briton. There were a huge number of post in the thread and most people myself included agreed that rape should be banned from the game. I mean fine ok done.
Then a few months later the same futa came on the forum and apologized she was clearly in pain and said she had lied to her sub about being a RL female. Note her sub was a RL lesbian and had been abused by men and had refused to ever sleep with a man again. The futa had told her she was really a man in RL and apologized to her on the for deceiving her saying she loved her and stuff and she felt awful for hurting her by lying.
I a pretty sure from looking at those two’s profiles that they were into some really kinky things like bondage at least, so I think they were kind of hypocrisy. Also what the dom did is likely closer to RL rape then whatever happens in a “rape room”.
But lets continue later one of my friends was accused of supporting rape rooms by saying she wasn't bothered by it and that she was a rape survivor herself. Many of the same people who always pop up in these threads about rape rooms were attacking her. I feel not because they were so horrified by what she said but because they are into power games and are using this issue to both justify their own deviant behavior and also have power over others.
There isn’t any different between “slavery” a lot of the BDSM stuff and “Rape RP”. The different is simply semantics many of you come on here and post on a thread like this so you feel better about yourselves when your really kind of a bunch of twisted freaks. Back when the word was banned it was possible to rape someone using the .dll that is not possible any longer. All the sex is consensual here now so why freak out about a particular word? Its not because of the word its because many of you feel guilty about your kinks.
 

Sorry but no Rape is more then just RPing have a knife or gun pointed at your head. I already said I didn't think it should be allowed, but your lying to yourself if you think slavery isn't rape. I am not going to argue about whether it should be allowed it shouldn't be, but slavery is also illegal. There are plenty of story about people who are into BDSM then raping people because the RP isn't enough for them is its problematic and a gateway to abuse. 

Server fixed! Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for supporting us!

I don't think that this is as big an issue as some people want to make it out to be. 3DX Chat should boot someone who you put them on ignore from your room, but that is all that is needed. I personally don't think that people who open rooms to the public should be allowed to set rules for them. What I mean by that is that people who are being actually hostile in chat should be kicked from the room if the host puts them on ignore, but I don't think that host should be allowed to abuse it to boot people who are just having sex, and not bothering anyone. I kind of feel the same about colds those are simple to just close, or let time out most of the time, persistent ones can be annoying, but there is always ignore. Its not really the huge issue that some people think it is.

I think if the devs want there to be rooms where sex or colds are not allowed they should just make it possible for the host to disable sex poses, and partnering, but I don't think that its a good idea for room host to be allowed to enforce whatever arbitrary rules they have come up with on the general public. If a room has been opened to the public that means it has become a public place, and people should be only held to the conduct that is acceptable in public places in 3DX.

I think alts as they are now is kind of the worst of both they provide no actual privacy, and enough secrecy for them to be useful to harass people. If there was an account wide name which was visible then there also would be no reason not to allow more then three alts or require people to pay for new ones. It also addresses most of the concerns about allowing name, and gender changing. It should be possible to get the same limited degree of privacy alts provides other ways. For example adding a character ignore function, so you don't run into someone you know, or other ways as Rockster said. This way alts would also not be treated differently, and since each alt would still have its own friends list even without any added privacy features they would still provide a degree of anonymity. Personally it doesn't matter to me I don't' see how someone using an alt can cause me any type of long term bother, and unless someone is using the alt to bother people I still think its really not anyone else's concern.

What about if you have been married to the same person more then once like me. We got into a fight, and I logged on and found I had been divorced, but we never broke up and later remarried.

Well some people pick awful names or ones they don't like when they first join and those people should be allowed to change them I think. What if the cost to change your name increased each time you did it like the picture slots?

I was thinking and it seems to me it would be nice if there were objects that moved in the world editor. For example an elevator that goes up and down when a button is pressed. An escalator that is constantly on, or a train or cruise ship that stops and starts at various stations or docks. I think that it would allow for larger worlds without having the issue of people crashing cars, planes, or boats into things if it was setup to run on timers or button presses. For the train example it might also be necessary to be able to tie how fast the wheels spin to how fast the train is moving forward.

There are only so many ways to put things I am sure if something like that was done they would run out of ways after a while as each was reported.

The best idea is just to have a few mods for WC who can ban people from WC and close rooms after they have submitted a report detailing why they did it. Maybe the community can elect them for one month periods or something like that.

Yes and I made a tool like that as well. I just updated it a few days ago to work with normal png files.

I have to say I agree with this just saying suppose the poll had gone the other way do people really think we would get more poses? I am fairly sure that the skill set needed to make a pose editor and make more poses are totally different... It seems to me that the devs mostly add them in bust maybe they hire someone to make them now and again we likely will never know. The best thing is more editors and them letting the community add more content.

One thing I think would be really useful is if the Volume Scale Gizmo had an edge snap option which snapped to the nearest conjoining edge when you hold down a button like E for example and drag the handle.
 

I should be less impatient sometimes. 

Something I have been working on.

wouldn't miss it for the world 
Definitely be there