Jump to content
3DXChat Community

THX

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by THX

  1. THX
    I think it's like most tests. You devise a test that suits what your testing. (if you want a scientific test). There are T and Z statistical tests based on >30 or <30. But you have to test the right question. It needs to be specific too. What question is it you want to ask? It has to be specific. can't be too general. What question do you propose?
  2. THX
    *Not knocking your desire to know (I think it is a good and logical question), but why would someone want to go in a forum and bother? Sure, you may get a few, but is that a good sample size to make a conclusion from? Sample size of 20-30 may be a minimum. 30 is the academic standard. That seems kinda low to me.
  3. THX
    Did you really think that group are going to do that? No, they are a silent bunch mostly who don't even know forums exist. Most don't have any desire for anyone to know what they are doing.
  4. THX
    Put on your big boy pants bro. You know your premise was terrible.
  5. THX
    You'd think since Lovense is a major partner this would be an obvious thing.
  6. THX
    Gizmo is also aware of it since the patch release. Shouldn't be long till fixed.
  7. THX
    I would disagree. As I have already laid out.
  8. THX
    What is weird about anatomy? You need to have a general understanding of it and movement. Of course different boobs react differently. That is the point. The newer soft body physics are closer and better than the old hard body Nvidia approach native to Unity. I don't think though things are to the point individual breasts react independently yet in Unity 5. I could be wrong. Jumping is another subject. I am no expert, but that is a collide that also affects soft bodies (I think). If you look at this guys work, it should be clear how much better things can be when Gizmo get things dialed in. Look at the natural movement of breast and butt. This is only a quick example. https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/726454 I am NOT stating this is what Gizmo is using. I have no inside knowledge. I am stating that the newer physics are a superior approach. This, or whatever he's doing along these lines. THAT is pretty impressive in my book.
  9. THX
    Compared to the old way, yes the physics are better overall. That doesn't mean they are right and don't need adjusted - as I've said from the begining. As anyone can see from the examples, natural boobs move all over the place. The old way - good for it's time looks like a bad boob job from a cheap cosmetic surgeon. Plenty of videos showing how the newer physics can make far more natural movement. Even butts.
  10. THX
    I referred specifically to the breast changes and elaborated to what is attractive to women from other worlds if you read back. Physical Avi customization is a big bonus from other worlds that doesn't have this level of customization. (Men also). It's one of the big draws. And yes, I'm sure Gizmo will tweak the physics and only go backwards if there was no path forward. It looks like there are several things he's working on fixing currently. Btw, everyone should get used to snafus after updates. Notice the lipstick issue? It popped up out of nowhere and no lipstick update was added. Something else messed it up.
  11. THX
    When you run away it proves my point even more. Your original premise was that the breast physics 'don't look' real. I then rebutted your assertion and later provided actual evidence of real boobs to dispute your assertion. You didn't like visual evidence that contradicted you. You then argued later to go back to how they were. I countered your arguement with the old way doesn't look natural. Later you stated you knew what the majority wanted. I disputed that. That is everything in a nutshell.
  12. THX
    If I was Trolling you, you would know it. If you can't rember what you have stated what's the point to continue? All one has to do is read back. My memory is rather good.
  13. THX
    We both know what you said. It's not worth the effort.
  14. THX
    Old evolves into the new in a growing VR world. Development is what draws people in. Updated content is what they want. Personalization is what the vast majority have wanted forever. Going backwards is not wise.
  15. THX
    Look, I am very well aware of how people employ Red Hearings in arguement to try and shift focus -which won't work. I have confronted you with your own words, and now you realize how your position to go backwards in Development is ludicrous and your claim to know what the majority want is preposterous. Your own words are right here.
  16. THX
    Having made women's clothing for years and having made a good chunk of money makes me far more educated in what is desired than you. You also need to understand basic anatomy. Whining is the process where instead of pointing something out critically and having the option to make it better but choosing not to is whining. I will speak from a point of knowledge on the subject. I have far more experience in these matters it seems than you. You are perhaps the biggest whiner on the forum. All anyone has to do is read back through your incessant bashing of the Devs. I will be more than happy to lecture you.
  17. THX
    I have read you and quoted you. To even think most people don't want development has to be the most rediculous thing I've heard. You may be in this tiny world, but updates a d development in the older and bigger worlds are the most sought after requests. Many women come over to 3DX from the older workds specifically because of the Avi customization. Breast being among the customizations they like. PLEASE dont try to tell me about your knowledge of what is wanted. You are dead wrong if you think going back is a good thing. It's the most stupid of all.
  18. THX
    You just said that 3 posts above. That is an out of touch assumption. You have also stated you want to go backwards in development. Your words.
  19. THX
    You stated you knew what the majority wanted - which you clearly don't if you are arguing against improvements. Breast in this specific case.
  20. THX
    Lol You think the majority don't want improvements? That has to have just taken first place on the ludicrous assumption list.
  21. THX
    Now you are upset because you realize - I realize, you really don't know what your talking about and just felt the need to add your two cents and you are trying to claim you know what women want (and everyone). Which in this conversation would be the same as arguing they and others DON'T want improvements to breast physics. Which makes no sense whatsoever.
  22. THX
    As I said in my first reply to you, you can like what you want, but to remain in the past is not even close to what the majority wants. They want improvements and Gizmo is working at providing them. Most don't seem bothered with what you are a d if it bugs you, turn the physics off.
  23. THX
    Bro, how long you've been in the game is irrelevent. RL male or female and how they feel an a a out breast physics is not as relevent as how they actually move anatomically. Your "feelings"point doesn't make sense. For the simple fact that a imations arn't made on feelings, but a anatomy. This should be very simple to u derstand.
  24. THX
    Yes, you started a topic in a forum for discussion. The arguement to go back to how things were before is rediculous.
  25. THX
    Lol The Devs will address if they feel the need. They have already addressed this in world chat. Don't state what you don't know. If you didn't know how breasts moved, now you have several examples to learn from.
×
×
  • Create New...