JessicaX

I don't see a button in game that says: Copy this room So ANY procedure in doing this is considered a hack and using the software in ways for which it was not intended to gain access to something that is not possible without using such hack. It's very simple logic. if someone copies a room, it is a hack, plain and simple. But don't you dare talk about that hack.. that will get you suspended. But using the hack... sure go ahead, we are too lazy to do anything about it. It takes too much time and costs too much to fix! Yes we all know nothing is 100% secure, but it would not take much to implement even something that could watermark or ID a room to a certain user and then encrypt the data being sent. Will it be 100% successful in every instance? certainly not, but it would be easier to track who is doing it and it would also be better than doing absolutely nothing to try and protect the data. Repeating what Gizmo said over and over and telling everyone nothing will work is unacceptable to me. Sorry. I am not a conformist. When I see something happening that I think is not right, I will speak up about it, and this situation we have right here is not right.

I agree on most of what you said except for what has been quoted above. This major issue here is that in order to copy a user's room, you must use third party programs and/or use the software in ways for which it was not intended to gain access to something that the framework of 3dx was not designed for. This labels that action as a hack, which is clearly against the ToS that was posted by the devs themselves. If they want to hold a stance that user rooms are public info, then how can it be justified that a user was suspended by giving out the information on how to do this? They can't take the stance by accepting that room copying is acceptable but showing someone how to do it will get you suspended. The act of suspending someone for posting the hack clearly shows that the act of copying a room does go against the ToS. So my question is: How is it worse to provide information on how to perform the act than to actually perform the act?

I think you need to understand something. What I do in 3dx and how I see this product and what I do with my time here is MY concern, not yours. You have no right to right to try and tell me or anyone else what this is and how it should be used. 3DX is different for everyone. We all use it in different ways and we all get something different from it. I can only feel sorry for you if you think 3dx is a "sex game" only. The "sex game" aspect got boring to me after being here for 30 days. The social aspect is what keeps me here. I don't expect you or anyone else to understand that, but in the same way, I will not try to tell you that you cannot make porno videos out of avatars and sex poses that all look the same. If that's your thing then knock yourself out. Just don't tell me what 3dx is or should be. I know what it is, just as you know what it is for you.

This is a terrible analogy. SexGameDevil does not need to hack their own game to convert a user room for use in a public location. If they did decide to do that, i am quite sure they would give credit to the people who built it. You seem to be unable to understand the root issue: People are hacking their game to make copies of other people's rooms which is very clearly against the ToS. They have come out and stated that they will allow this, yet they suspended a user for showing people how to do what they already said was acceptable. The action of stealing the room is acceptable but giving out the information on how to do that is a worse offense. It's truly the most backwards way of thinking I have seen here yet. The only answer I have seen to this has been: "It's their game and they can do what they want". Ok then why have any rules at all? if you aren't even going to enforce the rules, how are we to know which ones are valid and which ones aren't? This is going to affect them in the long run. maybe not now and maybe not next week, but it will affect them if they don't do anything about it.

The answer is... Gizmo has the power and ability to put something together so that this doesn't even happen in the 1st place. Yes you don't like the room ownership thread, it's not a perfect solution and I agree, but it's something! What we don't need is the constant reminder of how things are. I think what the OP is looking for is positive ideas instead of posts where we are all told what he already stated. His stance is that he does not care if the rooms are stolen, but he did suspend a user for showing how to steal the rooms. That means that the giving out information on how to perform an act is seen as worse than actually doing the act. Your reply to this has been something like: "It's his game and he can do what he wants". Well technically you are right, but that doesn't mean it's right. Some people like myself stand up and voice an opinion when we see something that doesn't seem right. Others sit by and just simply accept the way things are. There has never been a single time in our history of this world when clear wrong doing is in effect and has turned out in a positive way by accepting the status quo.

Or they could simply encrypt their data even a tiny bit.

In this current round of issues of streaming in private rooms... every case where the issue was people not able to hear the music... the DJ was using myradiostream.... I use gecko, others use other providers, no issues with any other provider. That is all I can tell you. I can tell you that not all stream servers are of the same quality, sure the common software for shoutcast is Centova but that is only 1 part of a larger machine.

https://www.mixcloud.com/Jess010783/3dx-milliways-june-30th-2018/

Epic party at Milliways

Brett, the point this whole time is that posting the rules is kinda silly because they don't enforce them in a consistent way. Its hacking and using the software in ways it was not intended for, in order to copy a user room. The stance is that... It's ok to use these hacks and copy these rooms. But if you show people how to do it, you will be punished. I'm sorry but you can't logic that any way you slice it. It makes no sense.

I didn't know those were yours.. i have have visited all these locations, that bridge is super crazy realistic in VR.

This is exactly the point. Why was Pier banned for showing how to do this, but the people who actually do this are free to run wild and the devs don't care? Seem's messed up to allow countless people to break rules and only punish the one who tried to show others how to do it.

BTW.. this is what it's like to be a DJ in 3DX.

The public room thing has been an issue also. The music just stops randomly sometimes. But in private rooms.. its a much bigger issue. There's many times the stream cannot even be heard at all or will stop even after a few seconds. And in every case I know of for me personally, its because the stream was from myradiostream. I don't mean to offend anyone but everyone i have ever known that has ever used this service has had countless issues over the years. I would suggest something different.

or dumb enough.. depending on how ya read that.

Also I don't think Rob is smart enough to steal a room

unfortunate truths

It's a step in the right direction. I know it boils your blood to see me connected to anything positive. You will be ok tho.

Sansar is actually quite nice, tho you do need a pretty high end PC to run it. The VR looks literally amazing and when its completely fleshed out it will be something fantastic.

Its weird to me I have to show you what you typed. LOL You DID make fun of another user for being offended at someone hugging her You DID make the assumption that you did not want to be fucked in the ass by another avi I DID try to explain those are not separate issues and are one in the same... you are being pulled into a pose by another person when you may not want it. Just because you don't feel offended by the hug doesn't mean others are not. You can't be fine with 1 invasive act and offended by another. It's characters on a screen. I'm pretty sure neither one will have a lasting impression on your ego. Now, myself, I can understand the dislike for both. So for me to bring up the point that it seems homophobic for you to be offended at your video game character to be fucked in the ass, while at the same time laughing at another for being hugged by a random stranger, to me seems sound. I hope that was easier for you to understand.

if its been posted to a thread 1st.. it is quite clearly yours. Unless they change the forum dates. That is a very easy problem to solve. All that needs to be done is have 1 common source to upload your images to like the threads people have made. Now this could cause issue with someone who didn't post a pic before the room thief did but then that's on them. There's many easy ways this can be done. But any single attempt would be welcomed. The big issue I think everyone is forgetting is that Gizmo's stance seems to be: You can break this rule, just don't make a post about how you broke the rule.

It's like trying to explain rocket science to a retard. I give up.. carry on folks.

You belittle someone because they don't like to see their on screen avi being hugged by a random stranger. Then you are upset if someone were to pull your avi into a sex pose. Am I missing something here? IS there more to this story? How is this not the same thing? Only in the fact that you only see one of the acts as being invasive. Most people would see them both as being bad. They are acts being performed on a character in a game that you are watching. You can't laugh at 1 instance and make fun of someone for having issue with it while at the same time being upset about the other. That doesn't make any sense.

Not sure where ya got that from. Im Bi.. dun dun dun