Auto partner + pose & clothes control

[FutabaSakura]

So first of all, love the fact that we are finally able to let our partners take full control and the other way around. Making it a checkbox makes perfect sense in pretty all scenarios, except for one. 

My suggestion: The ability to have a checkbox on profiles that you've got in your friend list that would allow those people to automatically partner you and have those two checkboxes for poses and clothes enabled. Another potential option would be an auto home invite checkbox.

The reason for bringing this up is that I'd like my partner to be able to drag me into their home when I'm online so they can cuddle me and do with me as they please while I'm not around. Then when I get back I would find myself cuddling with my partner. It may sound a bit weird but it sounds comfy, to come home to my partner and I hugging or laying in bed together without having to set it up together first.

[FutabaSakura]

I can kinda see problems happening where you'd already be partnered with someone else, but I assume if statements can make that work  If already partnered, do not auto partner. If not partnered and auto partner is enabled, partner them or something along those lines.

[NinaSin]

Hi, 

I have a friended couple that sleeps together during the night, from time to time.
They partner, keep their computer up, stay online in the game and go to sleep in RL.
Sometimes, if one of them can't sleep, she'll go for a walk or something else...
Back in the shared house, she has to partner again, but her partner is already asleep in RL and AFK in the game.
They use a third-party tool to automatically grant partnership to a selection of users.
If you'd like, I can ask them for more details.
Just let me know.

Greetings from a newbie.

Edited October 17 by NinaSin

[FutabaSakura]

That sounds like an amazing solution for now! I would love to know more about that if possible of course.

[MeiLing]

Rapper are back?

[Lunarelf]

51 minutes ago, MeiLing said:

Rapper are back?

wdym rapper

[MeiLing]

1 hour ago, Lunarelf said:

wdym rapper

rapist sorry 

[FutabaSakura]

25 minutes ago, MeiLing said:

rapist sorry 

Not really sure what you're on, but okay? Why say something like that?

[Lunarelf]

4 hours ago, MeiLing said:

rapist sorry 

I think she do mentioned following:

On 10/14/2025 at 7:01 AM, FutabaSakura said:

My suggestion: The ability to have a checkbox on profiles that you've got in your friend list that would allow those people to automatically partner you and have those two checkboxes for poses and clothes enabled.

It's just like control pose+ looking we already have, if there's an allowance it won't considered as rape right? Also it do annoying that if we're afking then we can't do nothing but taking a spot in room, as long as it doesn't annoying like randomly hugs it will be fine 

[MeiLing]

On 10/17/2025 at 1:44 PM, NinaSin said:

They use a third-party tool to automatically grant partnership to a selection of users.
 

 

So what is this? A friend of mine mentioned this on discord being partnered without being asked. She thought that it was a bug....

The rest is for slacker lol

 

 

[MeiLing]

**forced partner, forced pose**

Had a very strange thing happen today.  I was sitting on a stool, my girl was kneeling in front of me.  We were partnered (and both had 'use me' checked).

Someone walked into the room, force-partnered us (neither of us agreed to it -- it was not a request, not even a popup), then force-posed us (which we didn't have a chance to decline because of the 'use me' option) which did popup and make a noise, but quickly disappeared as all 3 were dragged away into a sex pose.

I'm not sure what's going on here, or what would allow someone to force-partner someone (or two someones).  I can kinda excuse the force-pose because my girl and I had 'use me' set, but not the other.

https://discord.com/channels/537730036485193748/907281783933001768/1418781547770810441

 

 

[FutabaSakura]

1 minute ago, MeiLing said:

**forced partner, forced pose**

Had a very strange thing happen today.  I was sitting on a stool, my girl was kneeling in front of me.  We were partnered (and both had 'use me' checked).

Someone walked into the room, force-partnered us (neither of us agreed to it -- it was not a request, not even a popup), then force-posed us (which we didn't have a chance to decline because of the 'use me' option) which did popup and make a noise, but quickly disappeared as all 3 were dragged away into a sex pose.

I'm not sure what's going on here, or what would allow someone to force-partner someone (or two someones).  I can kinda excuse the force-pose because my girl and I had 'use me' set, but not the other.

https://discord.com/channels/537730036485193748/907281783933001768/1418781547770810441

 

 

That sounds like trouble, but not at all what I suggested nor asked. Never once did I mention in my initial question that I wanted to enforce partner status on anyone I wanted... All I asked for was a function that would allow me to grant people I pick from my friend list to auto partner me. Why would we go to such a negative point right away? Felt a bit like a nose dive for no reason >_>

[MeiLing]

On 10/17/2025 at 1:44 PM, NinaSin said:

Hi, 

I have a friended couple that sleeps together during the night, from time to time.
They partner, keep their computer up, stay online in the game and go to sleep in RL.
Sometimes, if one of them can't sleep, she'll go for a walk or something else...
Back in the shared house, she has to partner again, but her partner is already asleep in RL and AFK in the game.
They use a third-party tool to automatically grant partnership to a selection of users.
If you'd like, I can ask them for more details.
Just let me know.

Greetings from a newbie.

Can't you read or are you playing dumb.?.. of course you like the idea

[FutabaSakura]

1 minute ago, MeiLing said:

Can't you read or are you playing dumb.?.. of course you like the idea

The hell are you attacking me for? Isn't she literally saying that one of the two people in that couple is leaving then coming back, only for them to auto partner and (what I assume to be) cuddle/sleep?

[MeiLing]

1 minute ago, FutabaSakura said:

The hell are you attacking me for? Isn't she literally saying that one of the two people in that couple is leaving then coming back, only for them to auto partner and (what I assume to be) cuddle/sleep?

They use a third-party tool to automatically grant partnership to a selection of users.

 

[FutabaSakura]

Just now, MeiLing said:

They use a third-party tool to automatically grant partnership to a selection of users.

 

Right, and in the example she gives she mentions them being a couple, right?
Nowhere in my suggestion did I say that I wanted to do this to strangers either.
You're just assuming it's all bad and negative intentions, forget it I don't care anymore.

[Lunarelf]

3 hours ago, MeiLing said:

Can't you read or are you playing dumb.?.. of course you like the idea

I don't understand why there need to be such a malicious and biased guess toward her, so this post is your own talkshow and everyone else has to accepting your thoughts and ideas? 

Surely, according to what you say and quote it's "This function can lead to unwanted allowance of partnerships/sex, by a 3rd player, because of/achieved through an unofficial software". We have to admit that function will leads to unexpected but bad result if there's anything goes wrong, in short: Dancing on the edge. BUT if it's a function released by official it will surely avoiding this problem since

1: it doesn't need to use the 3rd party devices to gain and process ingame data. If the function exist it will just perform like a pre-allowing technique such as accepting friends and put in iggy (technically same), while 3rd party program may acting more like a key-gene that auto accepting any requests based on id recorded on it's list, and since they don't really have an ingame player database, it may happened like this.

2: If there is such a problem related to allowance, devs either won't allow such a feature go online, or need more efforts on it to perfect it, but either way—— if it's official, thus kind of glitch won't happened or won't exist for a long time since it's a serious issue that may infect on basic morals of the game.

3: It's a discord link that can't, or hard to provide any trustful evidences. If you can assume rape is happening, others can also assume this whole thing is a made-up for some conflicts. So please, off the highground and just face the problem: someone need such a function(not rape, pre-allowing use) and explained clearly and politely. As a respond you simply assuming they're in-game rapist supporters or something worse. Are you the one who can't read or playing dumb?

 

Also as a disclaimer: Me myself is not really into any sex-based socials of this game. Before anyone assuming me is a CNC or rape supporters I'll just say NO in advance—— I don't support and like any kinds of CNCrp, rape or sex without allowance and anything reffered to it, me myself technically play 3dx like playing blocks or life simulators but in a lewd way. But also: I don't suggest anyone who "rapist assuming" else who want a feature that may make the game more interesting either. OP mentioned allowance of act and claimed that this only happeneds within the range of selected personnel in friendlists. If you still assume others have such a thought to become in game rapist, bring some direct evidences that shows rape/forced use without allowance will happened as soon as devs adds such feature, or NO: this is not justice, but simply force-feeding your idea onto others, somehow also a forcing.

If what you worried is " post-allowance sex offenses", here's a complicated but working way to solve it:

※make sure new players doesn't join the game with such a function turned on—— which means the total allowance has to be turned on manually within game settings

※set multiple agreeing level such as "allow for social acts"(slow dance), allow for foreplays (only foreplays), allow for sex (all sex poses) and an individual option of allow to control appearances(all the clothing). I don't think "allow to bring me to xxx(somewhere/some room)or same map" It's technically achievable due to the chaos it may cause, but pre allowance within levels will work. Also: devs may also need to change sex-related foreplays into other sections while adding this feature, since now its mixing with a lot of cuddling and romantic only poses

※add a lot of warning boxes such as "are you sure" before players achieve this feature or adding one of the friendlists into pre-allowance list, while explaining all potential results and explaining "don't give this allowance to players you just know for 2 minutes, just because they asked"

※players can always turning off feature, end poses and remove other players in their allowance list, or simply add who they don't want to see again in iggy. Since they pre-allowing the whole act, the experience will be an allowed interaction between 2 adults, they already know the result, and setted their allowance levels, and received a lot of warnings, then they should receive the result, whatever it takes or caused.

※normally report any rape / CNC plays and acts like usual

problem solved, without the necessity of assuming anyone

[NinaSin]

5 hours ago, MeiLing said:

Can't you read or are you playing dumb.?.. of course you like the idea

Wow,

Euuuh ...
Yes, i can read.
Yes, i like to play, but not dumb.
Yes, i liked the idea of virtual sleeping together, i know them both and they are crazy. (In a good way)

As far as i know, the one who wants to auto grant has to run the tool and define the selection of users.
Honestly, I don't see much danger in that, but maybe I'm missing something.

Greetings from a newbie.

Edited October 19 by NinaSin