Well, giant titties I guess

[Coldheart]

3 hours ago, SusanLouisa said:

HAHA And of course you have a valid MALE opinion.  My opinion is based on many years of FEMALE experience and conversations with other FEMALES. Of course those who are in the porn industry may be into having 56F sized boobs.  Some may even pay a plastic surgeon to go from an A to a C cup but we were discussing the size all the way to the right of the scale.  I know more women who have gone to have reduction than enlargement.  Not at all narrow minded just based on personal experience.  As a man I am sure your experience is narrow.  Most women rl learn to live with what nature gave them.  On game they don't have to.

Not sure where you are going with any of this jibber jabber. You started out saying no real woman would ever want huge breasts. That’s a no brainer false statement, as it is not true. Everything you said after that just sounds like an angry chicken squawking in a hen house.

[SusanLouisa]

2 hours ago, Coldheart said:

Not sure where you are going with any of this jibber jabber. You started out saying no real woman would ever want huge breasts. That’s a no brainer false statement, as it is not true. Everything you said after that just sounds like an angry chicken squawking in a hen house.

Grins. I bet your a hit with the ladies.  I have no need to try to further explain womens opinions of their breasts to you. In order to be angry your opinion would have to be of value to me.  You just keep on knowing you know better.  

[Malene]

 

I have two female avi`s. One angel faced, small in "stature", small tits, hips, legs and subtle in every way, that also radiate kindness. She gets talked to a lot by all kinds of men, also the really shy ones, and even though she get tons of "real" comments about her appereance, and how good she looks, she rarely gets colded. The other one is the opposite, she is still subtle, but completely at the other end of the scale. She`s almost never talked to, apart from the (usually pretty dumb) alpha male pick up lines. The shy ones, park at a safe distance and just watch her. I know this because i have on many occations started a conversation aking " Why are you staring at me ?" usually followed by "sorry" from those that know themselves, or " i wasn`t " from those that belive they are more than beta`s, which of course the never are. And i have yet to go in a room without beeing colded with her, even the ones that clearly state that colds are not allowed, but i digress.

I belive many men make that kind of big breasted avatar for a number of reasons, one being they cannot get them by other means in real life and when there`s an actual woman behind the avi, not here either. They therefore use their crations to both fulfill their fantasies and to "punish" the women they can`t get by (ab)using their avatars in the most degrading fashion. An good indication of this and a male behind is when the avatar looks as "she" was dipped in a paint before going clubbing, because " that`s what good whores looks like"and the profile clearly states she`s a giant slut. Another one is the interested in men/women part. Some girls ar bicurios, and yes in here is a good place to explore, the problem is that so few women are here to begin with, and to think that "almost" all of the real ones would be bicurios/bisexual is just silly.  "Futa only" is almost guaranteed men behind female avi`s. I usually think of them as beta`s too afraid to go all the way, and is passive/agressive with their avi`s  only to a certain extent. 

The point is there are tons of reasons why men ( and in rare cases women ) play big breasted characters, curiosity, upbringing, societal indoctrination, personal preferances, to have what you don`t have, or cannot have in real life are some, but there are probably as many as there are people playing. 

Edited September 12, 2020 by Duschenka
Too many typo`s

[Xizi]

3 hours ago, Duschenka said:

The point is there are tons of reasons why men ( and in rare cases women ) play big breasted characters, curiosity, upbringing, societal indoctrination, personal preferances, to have what you don`t have, or cannot have in real life are some, but there are probably as many as there are people playing. 

This is kinda weird for me how you admitting a lot of reasons why men or women can play some kind of stereotypical bimbo in the online sex-game (which is true I guess), but in the the same time cutting all the men gender in two categories  "beta" and "alpha". In reality, even wolf-pack's society is more complex than just alphas and betas. And human society is much much more complex. Men don't divide in alphas and betas. Women don't divide in "good" girls and sluts. It's all about circumstances and shades of gray, in most cases at least. Life is much more complex than a party in Chess, you can't divide everything into black and white. 

[⚜ɛҳƈɛƖƖɛŋƈɛ⚜]

Hey, 300-400 years ago, no one thought that women would wear men's high-heeled shoes and cut their hair short. Life is really much more complex. 

PS: To understand everyone's motivations, need to get into everyone's head or do a very long analysis based on different types of tests and observations.

Edited September 12, 2020 by ⚜ɛҳƈɛƖƖɛŋƈɛ⚜

[Malene]

1 hour ago, Xizl said:

Life is much more complex than a party in Chess, you can't divide everything into black and white. 

Yes you can divide everyone into universally accepted norms, and what exactly are human universals?

They are traits that are shared by all members of our species, Homo sapiens. These traits can be genetic (all human beings have many of the same genes), anatomical (all human bodies share some basic characteristics), physiological (all human lungs, hearts, and digestive systems work the same way), or psychological and behavioral. There are norms and standards for everything, ranging from Iso standards that makes sure the charger you use matches the socket, to human characteristics and behaviour. Those that do not fall into those categories fall further down into the sub categories you refer to as "grey" areas.

There is classification systems in place for everything in the legal system, medical, schools etc, etc and the common denominator for all is that they start with a general standard that fits the majority of humans.

If you do not understand this, i cannot help as i am not interested in writing a master thesis on the subject on a half dead forum for a sex game.

 

[Xizi]

1 hour ago, Duschenka said:

Yes you can divide everyone into universally accepted norms, and what exactly are human universals?

They are traits that are shared by all members of our species, Homo sapiens. These traits can be genetic (all human beings have many of the same genes), anatomical (all human bodies share some basic characteristics), physiological (all human lungs, hearts, and digestive systems work the same way), or psychological and behavioral. There are norms and standards for everything, ranging from Iso standards that makes sure the charger you use matches the socket, to human characteristics and behaviour. Those that do not fall into those categories fall further down into the sub categories you refer to as "grey" areas.

There is classification systems in place for everything in the legal system, medical, schools etc, etc and the common denominator for all is that they start with a general standard that fits the majority of humans.

If you do not understand this, i cannot help as i am not interested in writing a master thesis on the subject on a half dead forum for a sex game.

Yes, almost anything can be classified. The accuracy of classification rarely perfect if we talk about human beings, but it can be quite accurate anyway. The problem not just with classifying things in general. The problem that classification you demonstrated in your post is as primitive and low accurate as possible. 

[Malene]

1 hour ago, Xizl said:

The problem that classification you demonstrated in your post is as primitive and low accurate as possible.

Yes, it was all my fault for typing the way i did, it was hardly consistent, and the logic was really flawed, so let`s go with that. You on the other hand where quite right, as you have been in every single reply i have ever read from you. They are all so facinating, i can hardly stop reading them. The elegance, the wit, the logic, the flawless grammar, and those oh so snappy retorts. Not to mention the everlasting fountain of wisdom and knowledge you are always willing to share with the rest of us mere mortals.

So thank you again.

[⚜ɛҳƈɛƖƖɛŋƈɛ⚜]

1 hour ago, jaytheboss14 said:

Someone explain to me what fuck is go on in here

People express their opinions about the subject.

[SusanLouisa]

11 hours ago, Duschenka said:

Yes, it was all my fault for typing the way i did, it was hardly consistent, and the logic was really flawed, so let`s go with that. You on the other hand where quite right, as you have been in every single reply i have ever read from you. They are all so facinating, i can hardly stop reading them. The elegance, the wit, the logic, the flawless grammar, and those oh so snappy retorts. Not to mention the everlasting fountain of wisdom and knowledge you are always willing to share with the rest of us mere mortals.

So thank you again.

I could NOT have said it better.  Just perfect. ^^^  

[Malene]

3 hours ago, SusanLouisa said:

I could NOT have said it better.  Just perfect. ^^^

I tought it was pretty fun, apperently you have an amazing sense for irony as well as Xizl :]

[chloe]

14 hours ago, jaytheboss14 said:

Someone explain to me what fuck is go on in here

It’s still about tits 

[Leopardus]

18 minutes ago, chloe said:

It’s still about tits 

Giant ones.

[Nektar]

1 hour ago, Leopardus said:

Giant ones.

Chesticles

[Leopardus]

1 hour ago, Nektar said:

Chesticles

And other kinds

[TheDonald]

Well cant be surprised with titty size in general if there was  a Dick slider bar most would have it maxed out i think.  Just saying