Jump to content
3DXChat Community

JuIsMu

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

About JuIsMu

  • Birthday 02/07/1992

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

780 profile views

JuIsMu's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

52

Reputation

  1. Due to desync issues, you might come across "invisible" people a lot. Their avatar simply doesn't load for your client, this might even happen with people you've actually seen before... they vanish. If this is the case, you can fix this issue by having the affected player perform an action of any kind, like hugging someone. The other option is to have either you or the affected player rejoin the room until it's fixed.
  2. Guys, the current ignore system and a potential ban feature, aren't the same at all. A ban would still allow communication between you and the banned person. Like i stated several times, troublemakers should be dealt with in a SUITABLE manner. Why you have to put everyone on ignore is beyond me... Wanting to get rid of troublemakers in my room, doesn't mean I personally want them on my ignorelist and thereby "banned" permanently from my content. Even if they cause trouble, you don't know why... sure, most of them are probably trolls, but it could be someone else typing on their account, them having a bad day or simply being drunk beyond reason. Point is, ignore is permanent, kick and ban isn't and those would still allow the culprits to justify themselves... to get a second chance and whatnot.
  3. That's basically what I stated in my post too... We should have all possible measures available to deal with troublemakers in a suitable manner. For most people a kick should be enough to make them understand they're unwanted. But if you ask me, we should be able to dish out temporary and permanent bans aswell, for the persistent bunch.... even down to the decssion if only that avatar or the account is affected... EDIT: Oh and for that "ignore is enough and does exactly that"-faction... I don't necessaryly want everyone, I want gone from my room, on my ignorelist... Neither do I want to stop people, I don't want to deal with personally, from joining my rooms. The ignore function should do what it's supposed to do... stop me from seeing their messages and vice versa. Right now it does that AND ban people (without actually kicking them though).
  4. A kick is nothing more than the instant removal from a certain location. When you're prevented from using the service after a kick, it's referred to as a ban. These measures in todays games and the like originate from IRC, the mother of modern socializing in the internet. I think we can quote @THX on that real quick. The kick is simply the most harmless of any measures, instantly removing disturbing people from your moderated space. They're able to continue joining and keep bugging you though afterwards. For stubborn people like that, you use harsher methods like temporary, permanent bans or even something like z-lines, which block your ip adress. And yeah, it would be nice to have all those measures available to deal with troublemakers in a suitable manner... not everyone (should) deserves a ban.
  5. Don't forget a potbelly slider while you're at it!
  6. When you put someone on your ignore list, they won't see your rooms in the public section anymore, thereby you banned them from game content and the rest of the community, like you said. A kick would simply remove them from the room immediately, not actually cutting them off from that content permanently though. EDIT: well, ignore this post since Lux was faster and stated basically the same thing.
  7. Seriously guys.... ONCE AGAIN: How exactly is a temporary kick, which you claim to be too powerfull, worse than a permanent ban on a whim, for every room the banning player might host in the future? You're basically against a less harsh alternative for banning, because it's too harsh?! That doesn't make sense...
  8. It's actually "vertical" synchronization, you're pretty much correct concerning the purpose of it though. But it's generally better to disable vsync when you have performance issues already, since it adds an additional strain on your hardware.
  9. If it's that big of a deal for you to grant hosts actual control over their OWN rooms, stay out of them and use the official rooms instead. Will that ease your concerns?
  10. It is annoying to deal with these issues for sure... but they said they're working on it, what else do you people want? Constantly complaing about it will neither speed up their work nor help the situation in any other way. Just try to be patient or quit the game, that's the only punishment/message you can dish out to the devs that's sure to hit where it hurts, when enough people do it. All you manage with post like this is stir up banter in the forums.
  11. I don't really need anything specific like sport poses, but yeah... non sex related poses, animations and activities are a must in the long run. It's kinda boring if basically all you can do is strip, dance and screw... not to forget drinking beer.
  12. This reasoning by a lot of people is utter nonsense though... It's the hosts room, if he doesn't want certain people in it, it's his choice... no matter the reason. That has nothing to do with being power hungry or whatever... besides, it's not different now, just that you end up on ignore lists for the "slightest issues" and are banned from rooms permanently. I don't see how being able to kick people would be worse than that.
  13. And WHY not? Having keyboard controls doesn't necessarily exclude point and click movement... a lot of games offer both alongside each other, either simultaneously or by letting you choose which one you want active. The keymapping isn't an issue here... it can be configurable and usually arrow keys are an enabled option, the point is being able to move with the keyboard at all. As for me, i'd definitely prefer moving with the keyboard... so it's a yes from me.
  14. I get why there are limitations concerning stuff like body height, penis sizes and whatnot... stuff like that would mess with the animations, hence the easy way by having only one type of body for each gender... that's why there's no real boob job pose either, since they're changeable. But yeah, I'd love to have more options too, especially an adjustable bodyheight
  15. Totally agree on most of this. Cum deffinitely needs more attention in 3dx, not just cumshot variations. And yeah, some non sex-related stuff would improve the game experience for sure... there are a lot of potential poses that could be done, the new "chatting on the phone" stance is a good step in the right direction at least (even though it's weird that you're talking to your hand ). Same goes for clothes, it mostly feels like you're being forced to dress slutty... a few more casual clothes would be appreciated indeed. An offline editor would be usefull even if the servers are up, you get easily distracted by private messages otherwise when you're trying to get something done.
×
×
  • Create New...