lMAXl
Members
33
Posted November 23 (edited)
Sort by number of visitors are the worse thing ever. gizmo changed it to avoid having all the time the same room at top. i don't think room owner want to remember the old time with zigzag room 24/7 open and top #1 all the time in sort list. the current one are the most fair sorting, bad one of course like all that get tested but the less bad. With actual system everyone can open a room and fill it. with good name to help fill, and knowing when good to start the opening and when not. also when to use xgold and just not burn them thinking need to be always #1 in listing to fill. ( filled many time different room with my best friend with 50+, 100+... with only like 5K-7K of gold spend, and not with an absurb amount. that why Xaufin telling " Waste of gold " not really true. still need luck too, will not fill every time but atleast better than when old sorting was used. it will not be by default so let see what will happen first..
On the other hand, search feature will be good. some room was already using room name with tag to fill, there will simply be more to use this method. One thing that could be exciting, would have been to be able to copy an Invite link instead of room name. link that we send on private message and when someone click on it, make them join room. Then, when we tell someone, for exemple: " i'm on X room, come look it's nice room ". People will just have to click on link to go there. would have been a lot of time saved.
Edited November 23 by lMAXl
When listing were top room to bottom room was the best way to list them. all you have now is rooms with alot dancers with the same names or room owners with same names filling the rooms how boring is that to go to a silent room not getting greeted and seeing 30 people with the same names lol. and now they play with the room listings again just horrible. they need to go back to the orignal way let top rooms be on top and if them rooms with 1 or 2 people in them want to pay to top theres so be it..But if you going to leave it this way the search should also offer a name search of a room owner.. thanks