Roomlist sorted by number, not fair for smaller rooms

[PleasureGirl]

Dear Devs,

 

Finally we got from Gizmo an answer about the stress on the servers.

But now something else!!!

 

With the last patch you changed the order of roomlists by number

 

I think thats not fair for the less fortunate players who have less money to buy gold

 

Because if a small room pushes the room they are on top but as soon as another pushes they are way back down again.

 

So there is no chance they can grow in number unless they use a lot of gold to push the room.

 

I understand this game is for you a way to get money in for you but you already get the monthly

subscription fee

 

Give a chance to the "smaller" players and turn the roomlist back to as it was.

 

I spend a lot of gold but I really am thinking of quitting the game now because its just not fair, its only a way for you to generate more income and not caring for the players.

 

I hope a lot of fellow players will support my point and you will see what the game means to us

 

Regards

 

PG

[MeiLing]

Tip: open the room often. entertain your host, have a good athmosphere, and you will see more and more peoples visit you. Now about the room with so much peoples. Visit them, you will see statues, still and silent, it is not what I am looking for

[Dynista]

I´m with PleasureGirl not every room wanna have 50-100 pees in it. But also wanna get a better place in the Roomlist, before the room lost just one place when someone push his room with gold to the top, now it gets down a lot of places. And thats not fair the room also spend 300 coins to get on top and than it lost places to fast. So see we get an EscortService in the game. We not interssted to get 100 people in but we also interessed get a good place in the list. and we payed for it before a lot of coins, but now it is coinwasting to spend coins to get up in the list, because a min later u can be down the list again.

 

So what was wrong on the old roomlist?  the places with the most people in was also find from everybody, no the smaller get no chance.

[Mar Mohan]

I was a DJ in a room on Sunday which hit 136 and when people came into the room they were engaged in the conversation or busy with a person.  So it wasn't very quiet in the room and most were laughing and enjoying the room and music.  That's always a good thing.  Spamming in WC doesn't always help a room either.  We didn't post like crazy just once in a while and drew a crowd because the room itself was entertaining with the people in it.  I encourage anyone to go around and see the rooms, you'll find a room that you'll like.  There are rooms that get a load of people in them but as MeiLing said some never say a word when you go in there or just a few talking people will lost interest quickly.

[Deeborah]

Well why not reduce 300 xgold to 30 xgold to go up the list ?

Easy.

No need to make a specific program/patch to manage a new function like a time of 15 mn before going down after you have paid ....

[chloe]

I also don't like the new ordering.... I don't know what was wrong with the old way of sorting. Does anybody requested a change here?

[Leeloo]

The fair thing would be to put smaller rooms in top as if someone want to go into a room full of people they will search it in the list and so check every room before and maybe be attracted by the name of a room before reaching one of these huge rooms who generally are fuck room.

[TashaTight]

The fair thing would be to put smaller rooms in top as if someone want to go into a room full of people they will search it in the list and so check every room before and maybe be attracted by the name of a room before reaching one of these huge rooms who generally are fuck room.

 

Would be better to hide room visitor numbers to anyone but room owner, sorta like you can't see visitor numbers in public zones unless you go there. Think would help many pick rooms based on what sound most appealing to them first, over places that look to have most people inside.

 

That said those determined in going where there is most people will probably still jump rooms, but nevertheless would not make it nearly as convenient as with current system. Plus might open their eyes to visiting new or other places they normally would not picked first because it's traffic level.

[Laurianna]

I second this point.

 

Met with someone spamming their room right now, and I'm not made of XGold like they are, nor am I ever going to pay for XGold on top of paying for access to the game.

 

If this way of sorting the rooms is really what you want, then perhaps placing a restriction on how often you can put your room up there would be an idea? But me, I'd go right back to the old way of sorting rooms. Popular rooms will be popular, but spending XGold to promote your room will once again have meaning. I just lost 600 XGold to being at the top for maybe a grand total of 30 seconds, because someone is spamming their button, and not respecting that others might like to see their rooms used as well.

[Torax]

Got the same issue tonight and gave up too...after 30 min of trying to promote the room and stay up each time for 10 seconds...the thing i dont get is that the person spamming had the 3rd room, and even when first, still promoting. Doesn't make any sense that the room with largest number can still promote the room >< I always promoted my room so far and spent a far amount on xgold on this, but this became pretty ridiculous except if now people spend more xgold than before, then for the dev point of view it can make sense.

 

I have these 2 proposal for the room list:

 

- split the rooms in 2 tabs: sex oriented rooms and non sex oriented rooms (in which sex pose would be disabled, yeah I know it is a sex game and so on  but i dont like so much to suddenly see people in action in the middle of the dancefloor)

- on top, like room open for group or open only for friends, i wish to see public rooms opened by friends first

[Malvasiah]

.... or make it simply so that rooms with for example 15+ people cant be topped and at the same time have a list of.. lets say the last 5 topped rooms.

 

present system is rediculous and unfair..

[NicholasP]

I'd simply go back to the old system. The only reason that I can see for making this change is to get people to spend gold which in turn means having to buy it all the time. For that reason, I'm guessing that it will stay as it is. 

I noticed someone the other day somebody with 100+ people in their room, sitting clearly in second place for a long time, bumping themselves up to first and knocking people with 3 or 4 people in their rooms down the list every time they moved up.

It's a pity, I imagine that quite a few people will just give up on opening their rooms.

[Lillianme]

There’s literally no point in pushing a room anymore.

300 xGold for 10 seconds? No thanks.

I miss the old room system!

[chloe]

It was not funny on Wednesday as I tried to make my room public visible. Good luck that I have collected so much x-gold in the past three years and have nearly no other option to spend all that money but....

 

Yes, the new system is unfair especially for new players who don't have much x-gold. Pushing a room for 1-10 seconds on the top for 300 x-gold is really the most annoying thing you can do now in 3dx.

 

 

 

So again: What was wrong with the old system??

I really don't get it why it was changed!

[LilLauraGER]

hello people, excuse me, but it is realy relevant to be on top places? is it a kind of championchip or what`? Sure rooms on top are better seen and fuller, but that doesnt mean they are good.

 

If you have good friends an are member of a community, they will come to visit your room - qualitity and  friends are the key. And if they dont come, it doesnt matter, u can simply have an eveningt in your own, private environment- the world will not bee doomed

 

sure the newbies will be look upon rooms on top first, cause the dont know, but its time to lean from the veterans. it could be a win for both sides............

[Deeborah]

New system can create more money revenue and was very easy to program.

It for sure is a reason.

 

And about people being rank #2 or #3 and paying to be #1 pushing down other people ?

It just illustrates what stupid Ego can push to do. People obsessed to be  #1 just to be ...#1 one day in their life in something.

[TashaTight]

hello people, excuse me, but it is realy relevant to be on top places? is it a kind of championchip or what`? Sure rooms on top are better seen and fuller, but that doesnt mean they are good.

 

If you have good friends an are member of a community, they will come to visit your room - qualitity and  friends are the key. And if they dont come, it doesnt matter, u can simply have an eveningt in your own, private environment- the world will not bee doomed

 

sure the newbies will be look upon rooms on top first, cause the dont know, but its time to lean from the veterans. it could be a win for both sides............

 

Probably some who view being on top area the user room list to be some competition, but for me personally it's more about the problem that most go to rooms with most people in because they don't the biggest possibilities that come with more people. This means that you have rooms that are very interesting themes are just generally impressive rooms, that will struggle to attract people from already populated rooms because they opened it late.

 

True if you're good host and have nice rooms it will help to try change this around and start getting people visiting your room, but big question in my eyes is if system should make it that difficult for your rooms to draw in visitors. Because you have rooms heavily populated where most choose to go because of the accessibility of meeting people and getting sex, is there really a need for to know how many people is in each room for anyone but room owner?

[MeiLing]

The name of the room matter a lot, Think 'what makes my room different?'. 'Why did I open this room?', What do I have to offer?' You should build your communication on this. I have seen room using the default room with a wonderful atmosphere but few peoples and crowded rooms that were ugly (the weak word here) but have 'cold' or 'BBC'....in their name.

 

Why do peoples go into shared rooms? What do they look for? That's the question you should ask yourself.

 

As the lady in black in a dark corner, I mainly at the Sin or in my room. I barely go in shared rooms (except by special friends).

[Maxx]

Great feature. Most popular rooms should be top of list.

 

Well done.

[Leeloo]

Would be better to hide room visitor numbers to anyone but room owner, sorta like you can't see visitor numbers in public zones unless you go there. Think would help many pick rooms based on what sound most appealing to them first, over places that look to have most people inside.

 

That said those determined in going where there is most people will probably still jump rooms, but nevertheless would not make it nearly as convenient as with current system. Plus might open their eyes to visiting new or other places they normally would not picked first because it's traffic level.

I don't think it will fit to remove the number of peoples in the rooms because it help poeoples to know in which room they can enter. By exemple , i know that with my actual computer , if i enter into a room with more than 60 peoples in it i lag as hell. 

[Eriksolo]

Ich denke mal das es unwichtig ist an welcher Stelle du stehst.

 

Die Atmosphäre die du deinen Gästen bietest ist wichtig, und wer sich 

wohlfühlt wird auch gern wieder kommen.

 

Es wird sich herumsprechen 

Und alle bringen Ihre Freunde mit, weil sie gemeinsam einen schönen Abend haben wollen

[lisafelicia]

The new system makes more money for the  game owners.    support their greed by leaving the game

[Leeloo]

The new system makes more money for the  game owners.    support their greed by leaving the game

 

what a stupid reason to leave the game. It's like "oh damn, i can't put my room in the top of the list so i leave the game" lol. Silly...

[XenophiliusLovegood]

My suggestion:

 

The first four entries in the ranking list are reserved for X-gold promoted rooms. If you promote your room with 300 X-gold you push your room on the first entry as long as another player does the same with his room. He gets then on the first entry and you drop to the second and so on .. if you reach the fourth entry and another player promotes his room with X-gold, you drop back into the "normal" list.

 

This would give you time to accumulate players and you are not only listed for seconds on the top.

 

Regards,

Xeno

[Keely Kat]

Rooms with more people should be on top. Fairness has nothing to do with. Work at getting people to your room other ways by hosting a DJ, announcing your room and events here, talking it up on World Chat. But don’t cry that room is at the bottom or not at the top when you do none of the actual work to promote it.