Jump to content
3DXChat Community

Character customization


Gizmo

Recommended Posts

 

It is called ZOOPHILIA. The Kinsey reports rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40–50% in people living near farms, but some later writers dispute the figures, because the study lacked a random sample in that it included a disproportionate number of prisoners, causing sampling bias. Martin Duberman has written that it is difficult to get a random sample in sexual research and that even when Paul Gebhard, Kinsey's research successor, removed prison samples from the figures, he found the figures were not significantly changed. By 1974, the farm population in the USA had declined by 80 percent compared with 1940, reducing the opportunity to live with animals; Hunt's 1974 study suggests that these demographic changes led to a significant change in reported occurrences of bestiality. The percentage of males who reported sexual interactions with animals in 1974 was 4.9% (1948: 8.3%), and in females in 1974 was 1.9% (1953: 3.6%). Miletski believes this is not due to a reduction in interest but merely a reduction in opportunity. Nancy Friday's 1973 book on female sexuality, My Secret Garden, comprised of 190 fantasies from different women; of these, 23 involve zoophilic activity. In one study, psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55 percent) of reported bestiality, both actual sexual contacts (45 percent) and sexual fantasy (30 percent) than the control groups of medical in-patients (10 percent) and psychiatric staff (15 percent). Crépault and Couture (1980) reported that 5.3 percent of the men they surveyed had fantasized about sexual activity with an animal during heterosexual intercourse. In a 2014 study, 3% of women and 2.2% of men reported fantasies about having sex with an animal. A 1982 study suggested that 7.5 percent of 186 university students had interacted sexually with an animal.

 

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia#cite_note-19

 

 

Zoophilic pornography

 

The legality of pornography has three components: legality of production, the legality of sale and transportation, and legality of ownership. In general, animal pornography is legal to produce where both zoophilic activity and the creation of pornography, in general, are legal. Laws concerning sale, transmission and ownership vary more widely.

 
Erotic art, such as animal pornography in cartoons and the like, which does not require the recording of an actual sexual act, are not usually considered sex with animals by the law, and so their status depends upon more general laws such as legal limits upon obscenity or pornography alone, and the thin line between erotic art and pornography.
 

 

idgas what your study could say , it's degrading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lillyme

Just wanted to say a quick thing before the thread vanishes! 

 

There'll always be kinks and fetishes that repulse and shock those on the sidelines, but we shouldn't be shaming everyone we don't understand.

 

The heroic thing to say here seems to be that "rape is bad", which it absolutely is, without question, but "rape play" between two people who get off on it and consent is definitely not "bad".  It is as much a kink as any. 

 

I get the TOS says no "rape" talk, but where is this line drawn?  Is it just at the word?  How about a room called "Con Non-Con Aficionados Meet Here!"?

 

I'm speaking practically here.  How much can two consenting adults blur "consent" on a 3d chat game before breaking the rules?  Is it just in the advertising of it that's the problem?

 

By your very own logic roleplaying this in 3dx is fine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By your very own logic roleplaying this in 3dx is fine

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????I 'M FUCKING NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY IS FINE ROLEPLAYING RAPE ,CHILD ABUSE AND BESTIALITY ,WHAT WILL BE NEXT NOW????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lillyme

Just to be clear...I think all these things are abhorrent...not to mention illegal...and have no place in any public fantasy play...

 

I’m just calling out peoples strange double standards...some things are ok to roleplay yet some things that I think are no different...aren’t.

 

Just interesting what people decide is ok

 

...and i’m tipsy so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By your very own logic roleplaying this in 3dx is fine

 

:lol:

 

I'll start by saying that I just don't do this internet debaty thing, I'm not trying to "win" or build "logic" traps.  I'm only just sharing my thoughts on things.

 

Which is what I'm doing here, I'm sharing my thoughts on this specific thing, which is that it grosses me out, that it crosses my own personal line for kinks.  Any stance I take is muddled by my own bias and experience which is why in my post I was very much backtracking and asking if the word "rape" was the line the general playing public wanted to draw.

 

My stance on that other topic was, and is, that "rape play" is a common kink and people should not be shamed for it, that the majority of those who practice it do not want to experience the real life thing and do not wish to advocate it.  But I understand if both the community and the company would rather it not be used in naming public rooms.

 

However!

 

Anything involving children and animals is a big deal for me, because neither are capable of consent.  So that's where I draw my own line.  Is it biased?  Absolutely!  A double standard?  I don't think so, since I do not see people role playing "rough sex" in the same arena as bestiality.  You can build some logic loops equating them, but to me, they exist on very different ick levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????I 'M FUCKING NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY IS FINE ROLEPLAYING RAPE ,CHILD ABUSE AND BESTIALITY ,WHAT WILL BE NEXT NOW????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I agree with "RobT" when he says "and for the record... they aren't real cats, dogs etc....   they are just acting like they are so no animals were harmed in this very strange role play."

One more thing I will like to add is that there is a difference between the terms called "BEASTIALITY" and "ZOOPHILIA". Zoophilia is a Paraphilia, "an experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, or individuals."  Bestiality is actually acting on that arousal with an animal. Yes, both involve sex but, zoophilia is more like a marriage that includes a relationship and sex while bestiality is more like visiting a prostitute for the evening.

 

Zoophilia is when someone has the same attraction toward an animal than a human normally has toward another human. Some zoophiles are attracted to humans as well and some are only attracted to animals. It is always an emotional attraction first and it varies in degree. For a myriad of reasons, some zoo relationships become physically sexual in nature and some don't.

Bestiality (only one A) by itself is sex or other sexual activity with an animal. A person who does this does not need to be a zoo, or even like animals. It is the act itself and nothing more. For zoos, this isn't fetish or perversion, but the natural continuance into sexual relations. The consummation of a loving relationship. 
Generally, non-zoo bestialists and those who enjoy the pornography are more interested in perceived domination, humiliation and/or degradation aspects of it. Rather than having any sexual interest in the animals themselves, they enjoy the aspect of a human (usually a woman) being submissive to an animal.
Basically the same difference as between "sex" and "sexuality". Linked, but not one and the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lillyme

:lol:

 

I'll start by saying that I just don't do this internet debaty thing, I'm not trying to "win" or build "logic" traps.  I'm only just sharing my thoughts on things.

 

Which is what I'm doing here, I'm sharing my thoughts on this specific thing, which is that it grosses me out, that it crosses my own personal line for kinks.  Any stance I take is muddled by my own bias and experience which is why in my post I was very much backtracking and asking if the word "rape" was the line the general playing public wanted to draw.

 

My stance on that other topic was, and is, that "rape play" is a common kink and people should not be shamed for it, that the majority of those who practice it do not want to experience the real life thing and do not wish to advocate it.  But I understand if both the community and the company would rather it not be used in naming public rooms.

 

However!

 

Anything involving children and animals is a big deal for me, because neither are capable of consent.  So that's where I draw my own line.  Is it biased?  Absolutely!  A double standard?  I don't think so, since I do not see people role playing "rough sex" in the same arena as bestiality.  You can build some logic loops equating them, but to me, they exist on very different ick levels.

I’m not playing logic traps...as I said in the other thread i’m just interested and a bit surprised by how people see these things differently and I wonder why. Lots of things that people do here or in the game are on my ick scale but yeah I guess we just have different red lines.

 

I was just challenging your thinking...but as you said its that you have different red lines...it seems to you the ability to give consent is a key differentiation...which is a point Allie made too...and I can sort of see that changes things very slightly.

 

“Double standards” was a bit unfair...just frustrated sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going fishing to catch a big one to fuck it up in that case, bye

attachicon.gifmaxresdefault.jpg

Good luck!!! Usually the big ones not far away from the beach, they prowl the beaches looking for women who go on fishing alone. He was a result of a guy's sadness caused by ZOOPHILIA not being allowed on 3DXCHAT, now he is looking to take his revenge on women who hate ZOOPHILIA.

XRXyrJx.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Whos da alt in da Armours" She remarked in a pissy tone to her frands in Sins as they all did stare upon tha one dressed fo daggers.

giphy.gif

She couldn't recognize him initially, but finally, she did.  He was actually her lover, both of them got separated in war, and with the efforts of Alliehotass, they are one again! Tysm Allie, you did a great job, but why did you leave the place in a hurry, you should have seen what happened after that. I also left the place after you. You must be wondering what they did after they met? Right?

One more thing, they are both  ELITE ELF WARRIORS from the "Magicka" which is a MAGICAL KINGDOM in the N-W of INDIA. They can easily change their shape and looks, whenever they want to.

First, she welcomed him warmly...

4k0DcDj.jpg

 

And hugged him tightly...

TiTqbZj.jpg

 

And lovemaking went throughout the night...

T3SquxQ.jpg

 

WGdCmvj.jpg

 

How did I know? Well, one of her "her friends in Sins" told me.

VBQN0pH.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...